Hey @Elear,
with all due respect, the Utopian moderators are not doing the job. Sometimes they just reject a project without due consideration. Humanity demands that when you look at the amount of effort a person put in, even if you feel its missing a few standards, you can point it out for the person to edit. But no, whether out of unfathomable bias or jealosy they outrightly rejected a well-crafted project of ours.

Just take a look at this: The Medical Utopian Project- Air-Clinic's Minified Whitepaper

Up till today, I still don't understand why it was rejected without an opportunity for fair hearing or at least to edit certain things. This is a project that began from scratch as an Open-source project. We built a website for it and placed it on github. So why the rejection @elear?

That wasn't the first time it was happening. I don't want to say more.

We all know that the bots follow what the moderators do, and your moderators and supervisors are biased as far as I can tell.

I'm going to pull data and prove to the entire steem community that the leaders of Utopian-io are biased towards steemians in the use of their powers.

One even insulted me inbox. I don't need to mention names but its appalling.

Its sad that these same people also make Utopian contributions and quickly get verified. So is Utopian now a community for only the mods?

Perhaps, mods and sups should be stopped from contributing to Utopian because they are going to be biased always.

Utopian is turning into a giant circle-jerk for mods & sups.

I just hope that @elear can intervene. I read your blog story of how you started from the bottom as a young boy without a father. Give others a chance to shine too through the Utopian project.

Humans make rules not the other way around.

Thank you!