well, if I just said "anarchism is a win-win", that would be too boring. 2. It wouldn't educate nobody as to the various types of arguments out there. and 3. It is much more fun to actually make arguments and points.

Also, the issue is not that the statist can say, "in a stateless society you can't have x" or "with a state you can't have y". but rather, that of weighting the worse case scenarios of each, and the best case scenarios of each, and then making a decision.