How The American School System Has Destroyed The Value Of A High School DiplomasteemCreated with Sketch.

Let me preface this article by saying that I am an educator with over a decade of experience in the public education system. I have taught science in a handful of different districts with different demographics and socioeconomic make ups. I see the value and the place for a free public education system, but I am not blind to the problems within our system here in America. Indeed, I see many things that need to be changed and, in some instances, completely overhauled.

The opinions shared in this post are my own. They are in no way an indictment against any particular school that I have worked at, and especially not my current district. In fact, I was ready to get out of the education business completely until I landed here, and I am pretty sure this will be my last stop in the field. I’ll either retire from here or find a new career path.

All that being said, let’s dive right in.

Growing up, I was told that “it’s getting harder and harder to get a job without a college degree.” My dad knew what he was talking about. Those words are even truer today than they were back then. An article on www.usatoday.com reports that in 2015, college graduates made 56% more money than those with a high school diploma - the largest such gap since the Economic Policy Institute started collecting data on the issue in 1973. Furthermore, according to the National Center for Education Statistics, the cost of attending a 4 year in-state public university has risen from an average of $407 ($2,312.07 in today’s dollars) per year during the 1972-1973 school year to $8,141 per year in 2015-2016. In other words, today’s workforce needs a college degree to make money, but a college degree costs more money than it ever has! How have we found our way into a mess like this?

Our public education system has destroyed the value of a high school diploma.

I remember my first few years in the public education system. Like most new teachers, I thought that the sole reason for the existence of a public school system was to educate students. Imagine the naivety! It didn’t take long to realize that today’s public schools have to be ran like a business. Our government and politicians have ensured that. It takes money to keep the lights on and the building warm, and the money is tied to test scores and graduation rates. This has led to some disturbing trends, and one of the most alarming to me is the reluctance to hold students back if they haven’t mastered the minimum requirements for an academic year.

If you look back just a few generations, school attendance was more of a privilege than a right. Teachers were under no obligation to pass you along to the the next grade. Even when I was in school, it was not uncommon for students to repeat a year. In my teaching experience, this rarely happens today. I have had a handful of students throughout my career who I am positive would have benefitted from repeating a grade level, but I can not recall a single one that was held back. Back when I still thought I could change the system, I had a talk with my (then) superintendent. I expressed my concern about passing students along who could barely read or perform basic arithmetic. He explained to me how ”studies show that if you hold a student back, even for just a year, they are more likely to drop out before graduating). (This was the same superintendent that told me if I could make my physical science class interesting enough, the students wouldn’t even WANT to play video games on their school-issued Macbooks - but that’s another story.) Now, I have never seen this study, and I can’t even begin to imagine how a reliable scientific study could be designed that would gather that type of data - students who have been retained were retained for a reason, and no one can predict whether that individual would have graduated had they not been held back - but even if it is legitimate, that means we are knowingly passing students along to graduation who can not read, write, problem solve, or understand mathematics on a high school level. Some can barely perform on a 7th grade level, but they walk away with the same piece of paper as everyone else. Back when my grandpa entered the workforce with his high school diploma, employers could be confident that he had at least a baseline education. Now days, it’s a crap shoot. For some graduates, all a high school diploma proves is that they were patient enough wait it out. College has become the new proving ground in the eyes of the business world. It’s no wonder that today’s employers are looking for people with college degrees to fill jobs that historically have gone to high school graduates.

So, what can we do?

For one, quit handing out free diplomas! Not everyone deserves a trophy! If that sounds harsh, then you need to think about those who actually earned their high school diploma but can’t find a job because of the growing number of meaningless graduation certificates being handed out. For those who drop out and end up regretting it, they can always go back and get their GED.

Second, we need to quit treating our high schools like training grounds for college. College is not for everybody! There are so many kids just floating through high school because, in their minds, “why do I need this crap if I’m not even going to go to college?” Every public school in America should be offering their students the opportunity graduate with a marketable trade skill that will allow them to enter the workforce right out of high school. There are so many well paying and much needed trades that we ‘forget’ to tell our kids about: welders, cosmetologists, mechanics, dental hygienists, and the list goes on and on. Students should be able to graduate with the appropriate skills and licensures to compete for these jobs. I think we would be shocked by how much “student achievement” increased if we gave our students who don’t plan on going to college an end goal that they were motivated to work toward.

Finally, we need to develop a meaningful Alternative Learning Environment (ALE) program to accompany the regular classroom. A properly used ALE program should give students who have been held back multiple years an opportunity to catch up on their credits in something approaching a 1-on-1 environment so they can be plugged back into the regular classroom to graduate with students their age. It is criminal the way many schools abuse current ALE programs; using them as a holding ground for students who are considered behavior problems or class disruptions. Behavioral issues should be handled at the building level with expulsion being the final step.

I think our ‘everybody is entitled to a trophy’ philosophy has gone too far. It has even bled into our public school system to the point that our children are growing up without the basic skills they will need to succeed. Maybe I’m wrong, but I believe that the best way right the ship is to get rid of the water wings and force kids to swim on their own. What do you think? I welcome the discussion.


pic credit

Sort:  

At one time Elementary School was expected to be all the education you needed to function as an adult and you Graduated from the 8th Grade. That is why Government and Constitution are taught in 8th grade to this day. I am old enough to remember 8th Grade Graduation Ceremonies that were more like High School or College Graduations today.

I didn't realize that! I do think that students should have the opportunity to begin a track toward a trade of their choosing if they want to.

Awesome article!
Although my wife works in public education, I homeschool our boys all of the same reasons you mention.
I want to specifically address, and strengthen, your mention of ALE. You see, I had a terrible time in public school growing up, much of this stemming from my lack of parental guidance. My in-school-suspensions began in the 4th grade and I had accomplished my first trip to my districts "Alternative Placement Center" by 6th grade (I went every year after that until I was committed to the Texas Youth Commission @ 16yrs old for juvenile delinquent behavior). Although, I constantly failed my academic studies in standard school I excelled in APC. Unfortunately, each trip to APC would only last 6wks. I contribute my success in APC to the interventional and structured setting that existed there. As previously mentioned, I lacked parental guidance as a child; I believe the presence, immediate supervision, and guidance of the adult educators at the Alternative Placement Center was exactly what I needed to supplement and reinforce my personal development as a child.
I did eventually achieved an AAS in Drafting and Design Technology at a community college with a 4.0 GPA.

Great points! Some kids have needs that the regular public school system is not equipped to meet. There should definitely be an alternative for them. I am glad there was something in place for you.

This effect is happening all over education, especially in tertiary. The price and number of degrees continues to rise, while the value of information goes to zero (because of the internet) -- the definition of a bubble.

I'm a sophomore in high school, and I feel that over half the stuff I am learning will not benefit me in real life. In a good amount of my classes I have been relearning the same thing since fifth grade. All of our classes are useful but only to a point, there is a time where we start learning things that may never benefit us in life. I feel that By eighth or ninth grade, maybe earlier, students should be able to choose what subjects they enjoy and want to learn more about(algebra,English,biology,etc.). With that said there are still some thin that I think should be mandatory for everyone. Everyone should learn about the political system, our human rights,atlas basic first aid, how to balance a check book, and so on. Instead of being taught how to sit down for hours and take a test, maybe we should learn how to survive in the real world.

I agree with a lot of what you said. By 8th or 9th grade, we should have given our students a good enough basic education that they can begin to specialize and head down a specific career path of their choosing. There are a lot of kids out there that want to be welders or auto mechanics, and we could have them certified for those careers by the time they graduated! I'm not sure why this isn't one of our prime focuses.

That's deep topic lol

I have to say for one i always been very disapointed by education system, i'm mostly a drop out, i dont have even bachelor degree, even though im generally fast learner.

But the more it goes, the more the idealism about school and University being sort of temple of knowledge, to gather people interested in learning and research , has been clearly disapointed lol

Now most of the time when i see people having degree, very few of them are really interested in learning, or solving problem, or making innovation, and the level is all together pretty low.

About a year ago, got back a bit inti this envrionment to deal with blockchain tech, met a guy teacher at polytechnique school, i can say i was quite shocked at how little he was actually into learning, or even when talking about making ui application he kinda looked at me like if uts the thing of the year because probably they make very expansive buisness with people with high degree just building ui apps ..

It become all about making quick money being entitled in the industry elite because they have high degree, and they are the leveling field for the level required to be entitled to make money in skilled industry, and doing the minimum of learing innovatio to kee their head cool, rather than trying to push the limit of the known to actually make valuable progress.

Im not even sure if its the education system that is to be blamed, or more where this slide can be observed more blatantly, where the interest into science and learning as such is fading, and where it become about really something else, which i think is more result of industry hating smart disruptive nerds who create instability in market with new innovation, instead of leaving the good old dumb bush-like oil industrial or bankers making their money with 50 year old technology, instead of really pushing competition that they are sur to loose, in order to keep the economy more stable.

Im always also eager to learn and teach, but i have to say i rarely met people with high degree who actually like to learn and research, more having diploma to have predictible incomes based on salary grid based on degree and years of experience, no matter what their technical level actually is.

The result of this can be seen on many levels now, with lack of innovation, accumulation of debt, and things becoming more & more expansive for less and less quality in the end.

Not sure how thats going to end, but its in big part why i hav lot of hope with blockchain tech as they can let a new market o innovation to take place outsidr of the Mainstream industry and education system, which is clearly falling appart.

Most ico and coin trading is largely bs anyway, if coin are only there to be exchanged with each other for short term trading profit the interest is very limited lol

I quite agree with china on this one lol this whole coin trading thing has very little fundation in anything, and quite waste of money and time if you ask me lol

Still have to see a blockchain project that can be actually connected to real economy and actually do something useful for everyday economy, other than trading them for each other like pokemon following trading chart curves.

I think you've voiced many points I've said myself. I teach college and I really hate how it is now a business over an educational institution. College instructors have dumbed down education so kids can pass and graduate so new kids can come in so the institution makes more and more money. Today the market is so saturated by bachelors degrees that they are becoming less valuable and now the masters degree is the new bachelors degree. People have to get higher degrees because lesser ones are so devalued. It's a shame high school diplomas pretty much mean nothing in the job world. The education system is a frustrating place and I don't like the shift to it being a business over educating and helping people.

It's a vicious cycle, and I believe the way to break it is to fix it from the bottom up. It's going to have to start in our elementary and jr. high schools.

I am in agreement with your arguments that the education system is lacking. I question your statement that the system needs to be profitable. To my knowledge the funding comes (or is suppose to come) from taxes and in some states from the lottery. I know this is not working. I don't know where the money is being squandered by I have an idea. You would probably have more knowledge about the financial mishandling than I.

In regards to your idea of ALE, why not resurrect the trade schools. When I was growing up there were trade school where students that did not want to pursue a college career had the option to enter into a trade school. I believe that most public schools also had several courses in the trades. Also I believe the trade union offer a path to obtain a journeyman certification.

One thing I think you overlooked is the continued certification of the teacher and the abuse of 'tenure'. Not being educator, I'm probably not qualified on addressing how teachers are guided to keep abreast of new ways to teach. I do feel that some teachers are under qualified but that is only my opinion, it is not meant to criticize.

Overall I think your post is very accurate. Thank you for your post.

It's not so much that schools have to turn a profit; just that there are so many rules about how money can be spent and where it can come from. For example, let's say that a school district has received $15,000 (from tax money) for technology. That money is earmarked, so it can't be spent on anything that is not technology. Furthermore, if it doesn't get spent, it is lost, and they probably will not receive as much money next year. So, what are they going to do if there's money left over? Buy a bunch of crap that they don't really need!

In addition, a lot of school funding is based on student population and attendance. So, schools are incentivized to keep kids in the system even if they would be better accommodated elsewhere.

I understand when money is 'earmarked' but for when my kids were in grade school I'd hear the teachers speak of how the had to pay to buy school supplies, such as kleenex or incidentals for their class. They said they paid out of their own pockets. Or they would as the parents to donate these incidentals to the class. My question, are schools running on such a tight budget that they can't provide for incidentals. They must have some inkling on how much is need for thing needed such as chalk, pencils, paper etc. Would you not consider these items as essential to make the school functional. If they can't afford these, my question would be where is the money going? I assume the school system has a department that can audit the operations. Does this make any sense to you. Even if you consider the school system as a non-profit entity, non-profit should not run at a deficit. If they ran at a profit, the profit should be used to reduce the amount their are allocated for the next budget period. I have an idea on how government agencies operate. As you noted, if they don't spend all their budget money, they will get a budget cut for the next period. I also realize the money allocated hinges on the size of the student body and attendance.

When my kids were in school, I learned that some of the teachers were paid about 40 to 50K and the principal was making over 100K. Why does the administrator command that high a salary. I not actually looking solely at the amount but the ratio to the teacher. Perhaps the salaries of the administrator should be lessen to allocate more for the incidentals. Since I am not privy to the details of the internal business structure of the school system, I am lacking on all the facts and it is not my aim to criticize. I'm only stating my opinion based on what I have observed.

Lastly, it is stated that if the salaries were lower the 'quality people' would leave. Consider if the pay rate was lowered system wide, where would they flee to. I can appreciate some would leave for a different career but 1) in our current situation, they're are no jobs there and 2) they have a 'specialized' field so their transition to another field may be difficult. I attempted to cover all the main issues but I know my response is lacking. And again, I am responding in all due respect, I am not criticizing.

@sustainablyyours We need remain informed and concentrate on things that are hidden from the majority.

I agree with your complaints, though I disagree with it being based in "trophy" culture. (Though I do agree that Baby Boomers' obsession with giving everyone trophies is pretty harmful.) Rather, I think it's more vaused by incentivization- offering a positive incentive in institutional settings like this almost inevitably leads to gaming the system. This relates to our societal obsession with having numerical metrics for everything, even when it makes little sense to do so- as with test scores today as being somehow viewed as a measure of learning.