Reviewing some stories of government abuses and CHILD PROTECTION SERVICES (CPS), I found a very sad and recent story, this happens in Andalusia - Spain and this should end now, it is unfair that a family that has a child , that by not taking it to the pediatrician or vaccinating it, it can be taken away from your child, without first checking if you really have these problems.

The parents who did not reveal their names, they were given a nickname (Najat and Javier), to those who maintain their position, that it is purely ideological and that they raised it "by attachment", outside the laws that mark this society " , is a technique that involves permanent physical contact with the mother, her parents kept him out of all pediatric control and had never vaccinated, while the Junta de Andalucía based its decision on the child, one year, was " malnourished and in a situation of helplessness ", after doctors at a public hospital in Cádiz diagnosed that the child suffered from anemia and was malnourished. They also alleged that the parents were vegetarians and that it was one of the causes of the child's malnutrition, this being a lie, since the parents claim that they ate fish and ham.

There is a statement, where the parents state that the child's grandfather is a doctor of this specialty and was the one who diagnosed a possible anemia due to the yellow ears that the child presented and recommended that they take him to a pediatrician and the parents proceeded to take him to a hospital. private consultation.

If this is so, why the decision is made to separate the child from their parents, without corroborating the reality of what was happening, just because the hospital stated that the child was malnourished. The reality is that they had to make the investigations of the case, to determine if the child was actually sent to the pediatrician and see the recommendations that he gave them and not to take the unjust decision to take away his son, but as they are the ones who have the power, little they care what people say.

However, the Junta de Andalucía maintains that the decision to withdraw custody on a precautionary basis is based on the report presented by the health personnel of the Puerta del Mar Hospital in Cádiz. The Executive of Diaz explains that it is a case of very serious negligence that has placed the child "in a situation of extreme danger.

There are also allegations from his lawyer, where he ensures that the upbringing takes place normally. Around 5 or 6 months of age, the following foods are gradually introduced into the child's diet: banana, pumpkin purée, potato, sweet potato, carrot, various fruits, cereals and bread. The parents decide not to vaccinate.

It is also thought that the Junta de Andalucía does not even know what parenting is with attachment, if this is the case, the.

THIS IS WHAT PARENTS AFFIRM:

For their part, the parents accuse the Board of lying by saying that the child was not controlled by any pediatrician, since his grandfather is a doctor in this specialty and it was he who diagnosed the anemia, after they went to a private center. They assure that the action of the Andalusian government is "ideological", since they have opted for "the upbringing with attachment, outside the laws that this society marks".

According to the parents, they decided not to vaccinate the child once they were informed "conscientiously" and wait until the child was "well educated".

Now, the child lives with a brother of the father and his partner and the parents can only visit him one hour twice a week.

Najat says that the Junta de Andalucia lies when he says that his son had never been under the control of a pediatrician. He says that his father - the child's grandfather - is a doctor, who was the one who noticed that his grandson could be anemic when he saw "his yellowish ears" and that two weeks before going to the hospital he was taken to the private practice of a pediatrician.

The mother of Jonah says that, contrary to what the government of Susana Díaz maintains, the child not only fed on breast milk. "It's false," says Najat, "although it's true that milk has been the main food, my son has tried others."

VERSIONS OR COMMENTS OF PEOPLE;

There are versions where they say, that parents use as an excuse the upbringing with attachment to not recognize their neglect and negligence and play the role of poor people misunderstood before the media because it leaves us in a very bad place to the parents that responsibly have decided to give this Parenting style to our children.
The child had, among many other things, lice, dehydration, malnutrition and possible encephalopathy.

These two individuals are not trained to procreate. I am glad that the competent authority has withdrawn the custody, I hope that now they cure it, feed it and vaccinate it.

That one wants to eat only goji seeds, unfiltered water, unpasteurized milk and plant crops without chemicals, I think it's great, natural selection will do its job and the individual will die. That you kill your son for your incompetence and incapacity, that should not be allowed.

They have taken custody because he was malnourished, not because he was not taken to the pediatrician or not vaccinated. and in fact it is questionable that it was provided to take away the custody with the little information that the news gives, that he was dehydrated having a fever and being sick it could be normal if it was something punctual and if they did not worry about the child they would not have taken him to the hospital either I had a fever
Others say that being dehydrated can be a cause of disease and not that they are bad parents.
In short a variety of comments, which allows us to see the reality of things or injustices, according to everyone.

I think that the parents were responsible for their son, since they took him to the doctor because he had a fever and based on this, I can say that the due process was not carried out in the case, since it is evident that the child was taken to the doctor and that the Board of Santalucia, did not drink to remove the child from their parents without opening a proper inquiry, really determining that there was a serious fault by the parents.

It is up to the authorities to intervene and apply justice and return the child to his parents, and follow up on the upbringing of the child, so that in the future he can make a decision that conforms to the laws.

Fuente

Fuente

THIS PUBLICATION WILL DONATING 25% OF THE VOTES OBTAINED TO @familyprotection TO HELP FAMILIES AFFECTED AND SUPPORT FAMILY PROTECTION.

Thank you for taking a little of your valuable time and reading this publication and I hope it is of interest to you. place if you have, any constructive criticism, comments of interest or contributions to the content, if you liked give me favorable upvoto. Greetings to the @familyprotection community. Regards.