You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: New Contest Alert : Constructive Criticism and Ideas for Steemit
Heyy, sorry for catching up late with this comment. The situation in my country is not ideal at the moment.
I absolutely love your first idea of having two seperate pools on steemit. This will definitely encourage users to come up with more and more high quality content when they see they've a separate pool of rewards for good authors.
I think, the steemit team changed quite recently. I mean, not long ago, they didn't even bother to reply to comments, engage with them or anything. Recently, I've seen a huge shift in their behavior. Such as engaging with users. But, i think if they disclose the team behind that account, they'll only be recieving thousands of messages on their personal accounts, begging for votes, no?
I wish you all the best, and that situation will improve as soon as possible!
That's of course positive.
I wouldn't worry about that.
Everybody can send a comment on the platform anyway, so why taking the time to send an (anyway unanswered) e-mail with username and reason why to expect an upvote?
I think when everybody knew that @ned was still the CEO of STEEM he never had any problems with spam e-mails anyway.
The problem is that since there was the last hard fork where a big part of the community left to HIVE, there hasn't been any development on STEEM anymore. As investor one should know who is responsible for development of the blockchain, if there is still some hope or not?
I think it is important to know which are the persons one is dealing with. What for example happened to @elipowell? Is she still here?
Every other software company is more transparent than Steemit, Inc.!
Being completely anonymous and hidden is simply not what gives serious investors some trust in the company.