You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Jordan Peterson and Contemporary Christianity | Discussion with Paul VanderKlay
I don't really believe in a God, but just as i don't believe in it, i think, it should be fair to not believe in the absence of a God. Being Atheist is knowing there's nothing while you don't have actually proof to support your claim. Being agnostic, in the spirit of being precise and intellectually honest, should be a better option.
End of rant XD
PS: this was something to add on what you said about atheists being more logical
Atheism: "I don't believe in gods."
Agnosticism: "I don't believe you can know."
You can be agnostic and atheist.
For example: I don't think we can disprove the existence of ghosts and I don't believe in them. Makes sense?
Those conversations are stupid.
Those who believe has different thoughts on this subjec. For him not believing is more like disadvantage, brain flaws or illness. For him it's time to force yourself to believe. Do fasting, go to church ...
For atheist is completely different. For him believe is illness.
We learn throught time and personal drama.
no, atheists not more logical, they think that they more logical)) I am not about 100% of atheists, I am about some internet stereotypical atheist, who repeat Niche phrase