RE: Can we trust peer-reviewed papers?
I made the claim based on statistics. There indeed, is a small chance that I am wrong.
Yes, they are brought up by conspiracy theorist, because there is so much there that has been hidden and obscured.
Its like 9-11 truthers talking about free fall speeds. If you know anything about physics/engineering, then the statement "buildings fell free fall speeds thus explosives were used" is a factual statement. However, those for the "official" story will say, there those crazy conspiracy nuts go again talking about free fall speeds again.
In the same vein, I will bring up Tesla and Mercury because they are very big disproofs of Einstein.
My view on michelson-morley (how modern science doesn't believe in the aether)
https://steemit.com/science/@builderofcastles/the-michelson-morley-experiment-the-error-in-the-errors
My view on the scientific method
https://steemit.com/science/@builderofcastles/the-scientific-method-is-crap-it-is-a-mental-prison-for-scientists