You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Why I Advise Against Linear Reward
They're up for grab for the next least selfish self-voters. The most likely contender for countering selfvoting is independent flagging pool along with burning of flagged reward, which I guess due to technical implementation difficulty doesn't have much traction.
Indeed. It's a loophole with serious issues as I've stated.
Leaving the rest for grab for the next least selfish self-voters leaving the same loophole open as I understand it.
"next least selfish" = Not selfish.
Not sure how you understand it otherwise.
It doesn't put potential abusers at a disadvantage.
yes it does
Of course it does. They are more likely to be downvoted. Even if it isn't 100% guaranteed it pushes their incentives toward better (less likely to be downvoted) behavior
Under crowdsourced flags, this isn't so.
Crowd-sourced? Compared to what?
I'M really not sure I understood their crowdsource concept correctly but if so, flags would have a separate pool and would be non-linear.
I came up with the idea of independent flagging pool, Here's something I posted about it.
https://steemit.com/steem/@transisto/separate-downvoting-power-pool-concept-visualized
There is only one user involved when down-voting so there is no "crowd" per se.