You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Bernie's dislike for people who don't have standard jobs - A reason to flag people
I'm not going to read past your first sentence
So not a positive upvote to promote what people like or support of certain information getting out, but just popular posts win out because they have the most views?
When you assume "JUST" you are wrong, I do upvote content that I believe is good for the platform or projects I want to support financially.
I said post globally are about 30x overvalued, there is nothing I can do about that.
Many of your post are about taking away value of SP by wanting to regulate downvotes by your, I believe, fallacious politics.
It seems like, given your reputation, you're not going to go anywhere with that.
I didn't say there was no positive upvoting, the point is that when your promoting the downvote for any reason, and how its fine to do so to take Steemit in the direction you want to with the posts you don't want to be downvoted, that's the issue.
See? I didn't say "no positive upvotes". I said that supporting flagging/downvotes os not a positive upvote, it's about the attitude of how to go about supporting content and giving the others a fair chance as well with their supporters. Otherwise it turns into a flagging game.
Why does the downvote need to come in to guide Steemit into view of what you want it to be? Use the positive affirmation of content, not denying content based on you not liking the content topics.
My posts are about how any of the high SP users who have the most power can step in to decide to do whatever they want, such as suppressing others content or removing rewards that others allocated because they don't like it being rewarded. Meanwhile, other content is fine. If the people who preferred my type of content acted like you seem to suggest and agree with bernie, then they should be downvoting the other types of posts so that their type supported content is promoted more? I already tried to explain this above, but you don't read what I write for some reason, and then make responses based on not reading it.
I think you're reading way too much into it, and it's possible that some people don't like your style of wrtiting. It seems like you could always write the same thing with 1/5 the length.
There is no way I'm going to analyse your post for meaningful content. It seems like it's going nowhere and it's full of typos and grammatically incoherent uses.
Their type supported content is promoted more ????
Maybe assume that curator cannot do a perfect job and that a down-vote is just more efficient than up-voting everything else and maybe that should help you move on with your life.
I've deleted my post. Don't feel safe responding.