a better way to ask about gender in survey questionnaires
Survey questionnaires regularly ask respondents' sex or gender, and mostly offer only the binary options:
When presented with such a survey on paper, I typically add and then select a third option: “Fuck you”. (Similarly, I do the same with race/ethnicity questions when asked to choose one out of four or five options).
However, we increasingly answer surveys online, making this write-in approach unavailable. Furthermore, scrawling profanities onto survey forms fails to positively address the very serious problem underlying my anger: That the binary sex/gender classification erases folks who, for a variety of reasons, do not fit within it.
In what I perceive as an honest attempt at inclusion—and I sincerely appreciate the effort—Google offered (at least when I originally drafted this article) an “Other” option in its Google+ profile form:
But simply adding an “other” option still emphasizes the binary classification system; it reminds respondents that they either fit in, or don’t. Very few of those who don’t fit in enjoy that interjection when it involves something as fundamental as gender identity.
I recommend the following alternative for collecting gender and sex data from survey respondents:
Here the use of sliders reflects the continuous natures of sex and gender, while the division of the query into separate, orthogonal dimensions accounts for the distinctness of biology (sex) from social artifact (gender).
Certainly this scheme fails to capture all the nuances of gender identity, particularly its flux within individuals, but it reaches for a more honest and inclusive world.
Hi! I am a robot. I just upvoted you! I found similar content that readers might be interested in:
http://badassdatascience.com/2011/12/05/a-better-way-to-ask-about-gender-in-survey-questionnaires/
I wrote that article! It is the same content.
@steemcleaners @anyx
I cannot any mistake from cheetah here.
cheetah does not accuse anyone of plagiarism, it just states that there is a similar text. And as it is exactly the same text here the bot was right.
If you not want to receive cheetah comments anymore read the pinned messages in this Discord text channel: https://discord.gg/gpX6u8u @genderpunk360
I just wanted your team to be aware ...
Thank you very much!
What if I wrote the original article and reposted it here? Are there rules (or customs) against that? I'm new to Steem and want to do things right. Thanks!
This would be option 1 to get whitelisted:
Option 1: "I post my own content in multiple places."
Applicable rules:
1 - Only cross-post new articles (not repost old stuff). It must be within the same day -- preferrably the same hour. Reposting old articles that are not significantly adapted for Steemit disqualifies you.
2 - In each Steemit post, include a visible link in the post to the original content on your website. If "adapted for Steemit", which means a significant effort was made to edit or re-write the content for the new audience, also include the date and location of original publication. e.g.: "This content was originally posted to our website at xyz.org/thecontent, on 2018/12/01."
3 - Make sure your website article also visibly links to the posted Steemit article or your username blog. e.g: "Find our blog on Steemit, here: steemit.com/@name"
4 - ONLY CREATE A WHITELIST REQUEST IF YOU ARE FOLLOWING THE ABOVE RULES, AND STILL GET CHEETAH VISISTS. There is a good chance you will NOT need whitelisting if you are following the above rules.
To make the whitelist request write us in the Discord channel
Thank you for the clarification. I'll absolutely follow these rules from now on!
Also, other than post a link to the original source, and post a "follow me on Steemit" option on the original source, is there any addition thing I need to do to resolve this mistake?
Just follow exactly these rules. Then cheetah should not appear. But if it still does contact us on our Discord.