That's all about the first positivism, the second positivism

That's all about the first positivism, the second positivism began to develop, you can say using the results obtained by the end of the XIX century or at the end of the XIX century in psychology, psychology was rapidly developing, many began to seem that this science will be found by this science answers will be found. considered philosophical and did not have permission and empirio-criticism appeared as an attempt of a scientific method based on the achievement of psychology after the first positivism, it was based primarily on natural sciences ah primarily on telly And I consider the physics model of scientific knowledge 200 rubles. who the second positivism in this respect was oriented toward psychology correctly and another important difference is that the second positivism realized itself already as the methodology of science if the first positivism tried the principles of physics to allow social sciences before empiriocriticism rose to the next level of abstraction I try to single out the methods of sciences in general and here on Russian ohuevaiu comrade Richard Avenarius second Who was the founder of empirio-criticism it seemed that any scientific research should precede the researcher's research That is those mental psychological processes occurring in the conscious mind directed and that this scrupulous work of the analysis of consciousness and tried to deal with here can perhaps be clarified even more so that the term empirio-criticism means nothing more than a critical historical study of our experience if the classical positivists believed for a day in the bias of the real world and their tried to explore the object directly in the second positivism still focuses on the perception and perception of the following relationship between the subject and the object om of this room realizing that naive realism assuming that we are given directly reality such as it is exists it is not enough philosophical position and does not save us from metaphysics vk.com Quite right but empirio-criticism I managed to do completely without metaphysics That's why he was in the early 20th century somehow his popularity went down