You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Life Vs. Artificial Reality

in #ai7 years ago (edited)

When life was created it was pure, whole, perfect, and complete. Undivisible, immeasurable , and intact; it was imagined and put into the universal existence of so-called reality. The Creator, Source made perfection...that perfection follows natural law, law that cannot be changed, modified, altered or used to create negative effects in the system.

contradictory to

But there is an element, an ill conceived idea that one can and will attempt to modify, measure change perfection into something else, and that breaks the basic law. One may think that natural law is changeable because they think “why not, because I can” and could careless of the consequences of those actions or that they are so ignorant of truth that they are blind to it (transhumanism).

Either everything that was create is perfect and in law, or it's not.

The but is a contradiction and invalidation to the premise of "In the begining god created perfect". To boil it down "God created perfect, but".

As they say in economics that the “invisible hand will slap you” or in religion such as the idea of Karma (what comes around, goes around), or even a boomerang that is thrown will return to the origin: you cannot cheat natural law. You will be bound to those natural forces, rules and be reined in at some point in so-called time.

Either god created perfect indivisible or didn't. Either everything, including raping, pillaging hordes is god, or it is not. An infallible creator and an infallible creation means it cannot be flawed, otherwise it's not infallible.

The world is now in that process of major change and that change is to awaken to the fact of natural law, the Source, the Creator or to be forever in the cycle of death and destruction. The present world is digging itself into an endless pit...the Abyss.

Death and destruction are one side of the same coin, the other being life and creation. Either the creator intended for this or he did not, either the creator and the creation is infallible or it is not, there is no other option.

Blessed are all forms of intelligence -Animatrix

Sort:  

In the whole, perfect and complete there is no imperfection - it just is. In the false, artificial, modified imaginary AI/VR/Transhumanist made up world there is incompleteness so thus there are two, perfection or imperfection (floating independent bubbles of ignorance). You choose which side to exist in (part of the whole or not). Perfection or incomplete. Positive or negative. Harmonious or not. Modification of the whole, perfect and complete is imperfection at its best. In the universal mind all is possible and one can choose any path of existence...break the law that of the Creator or not, abide by natural law or not...Agents of the Abyss are everywhere and 'ignorance excuses no one' as the old Maxim goes, [Do as thou will...] and see the result. Pay the price for participation. And attempting to define the perfect with linguistics or numbers is just another example of imperfection or modification of the whole. One is either connected to the Source, the Creator or not. Agents of the Abyss are middle men for the other side of the coin, and those Agents are killing, destroying and manipulating all aspects of life as it is know.

In the whole, perfect and complete there is no imperfection - it just is.

Either it is whole, perfect and complete or it is not, ergo:

In the false, artificial, modified imaginary AI/VR/Transhumanist made up world there is incompleteness so thus there are two, perfection or imperfection (floating independent bubbles of ignorance). You choose which side to exist in (part of the whole or not)

Oil and water, you cannot mix them, you cannot make Water out of Oil or Oil out of Water.

Positive or Negative, Good or Bad, it is either Whole and Perfect or it is not.

If natural law can be broken it is not Law, least Natural. If there is such a thing as imperfection in perfect creation then it is by design and therefore it is perfectly imperfection. Same coin, so what's the fuss because you cannot have a whole with ONLY one half, as long as you polarize it to fit the dichotomy you ascribe to me thinks you're missing important lessons, and therefore your picture is clearly incomplete, but then again understanding that it's either perfect or it is not, or it's either designed as intended or it is not kinda ends all the "evil agents" story.