You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Why crapitalism is doomed to fail.
Under anarchy I think there would be much less help for the poor.
You wouldnt think that if you did the research because you would know that being poor isnt possible in anarchy.
You can be a bum, but that is your right as a free person.
And i agree, robbing the less poor to pay for the more poor doesnt solve the problems that generational wealth creates.
I say we nullify their advantages in the math, and shame them all into being productive.
Under anarchy it would be legal for you to get robbed and murdered so you would be poor before you got murdered.
I think generational wealth is fine. We need more wealth creation in general though and less wealth destruction.
Sounds good in theory but if they are lazy wouldn't if be easier for them to just rob you?
See there? You just did it again. Smdh.
Nothing is legal if there are no laws.
Of course you do.
Muslims think allah is great.
Same mental programming at work.
It isnt possible for you to think anything else.
You've never been offered a viable alternative.
All alternatives have been debunked by 'authority', and you worship that, too.
I bet you call cops, sir, dont ya?
Ok, stick with me here, 'Never pay for ANYTHING ever again.' And, 'An attack on one is an attack on all.'
So, no, not easier to rob me.
If my neighbors hold me in high regards it could get you strung up as an example.
Everything is "legal" allowable if there are no laws.
If you work hard and save up and die you think anarchits should steal your wealth away from your family?
You don't want to have anything? People don't just steal money.
You assume people would still band together and work together. I agree and that generally takes leaders to accomplish. Leaders typically do not do things for free so you would still have a quasi government.
I think you have a more positive view of humans. I think humans were generally so awesome and cared about you they would already be banding together to reduce government. It's easier to vote for smaller government than to act as a policeman.