You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Science plagiarism: Oendertuerk
Okay, so these examples are quite old. How about a recent one? Is this plagiarism being continued till today?
Okay, so these examples are quite old. How about a recent one? Is this plagiarism being continued till today?
That is an excellent point. It should be viewed within the context of the other claims:
Watson/Jaguar.force : https://steemit.com/art/@oendertuerk/fish-mandala-artwork-by-oender-tuerk-design, yesterday
My post: 5 months and 1 year
And then there is this comment by @acidyo:
So this shows consistent abuse on the blockchain. Oendertuerk has already been blacklisted by minnowbooster. I will be happy to look at more recent science posts if other bidbots require more proof.
Hmm, nice catch by @johnwatson!
I wonder how come this author was whitelisted by @ocdb when @acidyo knows about him!
Anyway, thanks for revealing the truth. I had set this author on my auto-voter. Time to re-configure that.
Can't help but wonder WHY you had @oendertuerk on your auto-votes to begin with.
Did you actually enjoy his spun articles? Did you think he deserved your support for his hard work and original thought?
Or, did you just notice he's going all-in on the bid-bots and you figured his abuse of the platform economics would bring you good curation returns?!
Think about it for a minute. Giving upvotes to meaningless content just because the curation-returns will be good is eventually doing just as much harm to the platform as posting meaningless content just to farm tokens.
But you already know that, you're quite good at the game yourself.
Some people take advantage of other's mercy.