You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: 636,333 WITH 194 MEMBERS AND COUNTING
Automated votes are not necessarily the issue.
Think one thing needs to be made clear. Strictly speaking, this is not a curation trail. It's a voting trail as the initiating trail vote is not the result of a quality assessment performed by a human.
That, in and of itself, is a degradation of how content discovery should work ideally.
But, hey, damn near everyone and their mom is pushing some sort of voting scheme so can't really single any one out in particular. They all suck imho.
I'm just saying. Let's call a spade a spade. It's an automated circlejerk with bells and whistles. It's not anywhere near on par with @curie.
Posted using Partiko Android
Woah woah, I was not trying to say this was the same as curie at all, and I have no delusions about what it is. You can call it a circle jerk, or you can call it a bunch of people using their SP to cooperate to earn more Steem. The functionality is the same whether you frame it negatively or neutrally.
So let me be as clear as possible. This has absolutely NOTHING to do with content discovery as that doesn't even really exist on this platform unless posts are in the hundreds of dollars. Its a bunch of regular steemians choosing to use their SP to cooperate and earn a little more Steem. Period.
I'd welcome any concrete argument that can demonstrate how this is in any way harmful to the platform.
I'll put it like this and it's similar to my argument against bid bot voting schemes.
The more SP that is dedicated to processes that do not seek to reward novel content via manual curation on the platform, the less novel content we will find on the platform.
You can frame it as something as merely as regular Steemians working together to earn more but everything has a cost and often that cost extends beyond the group.
The cost is the more users we have opting their SP into collusive voting schemes, the less SP we have involved with users going out, discovering the type of content they would like to see on the platform, and supporting it.
If we really want this platform to be full of content that we believe will captivate and draw in other user / investors, I believe we need to start changing the way we think.
This sort of thing. It's not it.
Well I hear what you're saying, but being on this trail doesn't stop me from curating. It just does some curating automatically. I still curate my favorite authors, and if I see something new I like I upvote it. That and following this trail are not mutually exclusive. There is a limit to how much you can curate as you need to keep your VP above 85%, but that's really not an issue for me, maybe it would be for some and in that case I'd say it's not for that user.
But you're predicating this argument on the assumption that if people weren't following this trail they'd be doing a lot more manual curation which I'd argue is probably not the case, and you're assuming that being on the trail means you're not curating which as I just mentioned is also not the case.
Most of my friends on here I automatically upvote anyway. I read their posts, but if I happen to miss one, I still want to support them anyway, because the reality of the way this system works is that most people aren't searching and finding lots of new content, they make friends and support the person, not the post.
You could argue that more people should, but I'd say that's more of a design problem, since there are no communities and no functional search, finding new content isn't something the vast majority of people have a lot of time to dedicate to.
My philosophy is more about supporting people vs supporting content. If someone is a real person and is posting some real content ie not spam, I don't mind supporting that person. I want the steem to go to the people who want to be here and are invested in the platform. Two things this trail incentivises.
how much vp does the trail take once per day approximately?
It’s not once per day, it votes probably 50 times per day but most of the votes are 1 or 5% VP some 10% and a few 20%. There are very few higher than that. So it doesn’t really drain your VP much. You can easily maintain 85% while still upvoting stuff you want.
We didnt have these problems with the n2, 4 post soft cap, and 40 daily votes.
Long live proof of brain!
Death to proof of wallet.