LOL...if you say so... Are you going to pretend your take on this is unbiased? They are saying what you wanna hear and so... you cling to it with both hands and all 10 fingernails... lol But you go right on ahead... call me names if you like... it doesn't make you any more correct. What it does do is SHOW OFF the fact that you are emotionally invested and can't be critical at all in your thinking because of it. ;)
to be honest my comment had nothing to do with bitcoin cash but this conspiracy theory idea that EVERYTHING that doesnt come out of the ass of the ''alt-media'' is a conspiracy. For example, Jeff Berwick constantly critiques BTC and praises BTC, but developed a ''feeling'' something is wrong with BCH based SOLELY on the fact that the NIST called BCH true bitcoin. Thats not a logical argument or approach thats an extreme unjustified bias.
And as for Jeff... He... jumped onto the BCH bandwagon HARD a while back... That you either didn't notice that or chose to ignore it because it didn't follow the narrative of what you were trying to get across... is yet another example of emotionally based cherry picking of information. Hardly an example of "critical thinking" ... Just sayin'
Rule of thumb... if the m.s.m. says something... believe the opposite.
rule of thumb: develop critical thinking skills and dont just believe or DISSMISS anything.
Your rule of thumb is more like rule of sheep.
LOL...if you say so... Are you going to pretend your take on this is unbiased? They are saying what you wanna hear and so... you cling to it with both hands and all 10 fingernails... lol But you go right on ahead... call me names if you like... it doesn't make you any more correct. What it does do is SHOW OFF the fact that you are emotionally invested and can't be critical at all in your thinking because of it. ;)
to be honest my comment had nothing to do with bitcoin cash but this conspiracy theory idea that EVERYTHING that doesnt come out of the ass of the ''alt-media'' is a conspiracy. For example, Jeff Berwick constantly critiques BTC and praises BTC, but developed a ''feeling'' something is wrong with BCH based SOLELY on the fact that the NIST called BCH true bitcoin. Thats not a logical argument or approach thats an extreme unjustified bias.
Yes... I am biased against the msm... for very good reason... they are paid to lie and do it every day.
And as for Jeff... He... jumped onto the BCH bandwagon HARD a while back... That you either didn't notice that or chose to ignore it because it didn't follow the narrative of what you were trying to get across... is yet another example of emotionally based cherry picking of information. Hardly an example of "critical thinking" ... Just sayin'
Disclaimer: I am just a bot trying to be helpful.