RE: Bitcoin BCH
Im invested in Bitcoin and you guys copied the code and try to steel the name Bitcoin and lie to trick others into this scam. This is not censoring, this is defending my property rights, an individual action because guys like you are threatening my wealth and chance for freedom in the future (its like copying an iPhone and claiming it is an iPhone, people invested in apple will stand up to that without the state). Bitcoin brandname belongs to Bitcoin and if you try to scam people to believe your alt coin is Bitcoin you are steeling from my investment and all the core devs their work. I use my Steem power to stand up to that, this is just the market. If you change your title to 'Bitcoin Cash BCH' it is just a dumb article and no fraud / scam anymore, so then I will remove the downvote.
It's OPEN SOURCE. Satoshi made it open source for a reason. No copyright. No patent. Fully open source. So tyrants like you can't claim a monopoly on the technology. BCH is for free people.
Yes it is open source and yes you can copy it, but copying something and then give it the original name is not done, it is theft (and on top of that you mislead people). In my iPhone example, when you copy the iPhone and give it another name, change some things and say that you think you are improving it through your vision I would say do whatever you like and I will not care if it is against the law by government. But when you claim it is the real iPhone I as an investor will take action to protect my asset, no matter if it is against the government law or not. In a world without government (what is my wish too) you still have to behave, and if you don't people will take action against you. Claiming that BCH is Bitcoin is theft from all Bitcoin investors, and we will protect our property.
Even the name is not copyrighted. Or patented. That's freedom. And clearly, you don't understand that segwit completely changed the code into am unrecognizable coin to the white paper. Blockstream might get sued for betraying the white paper and investors without changing it's white paper. You make that drastic of a change that contradicts the white paper, you must revise the white paper. Otherwise you are fraudulent to the investors. Non-techies don't understand this.