You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Latest news from Btc-e and some thoughts

in #bitcoin • 7 years ago

no panic at all ! I am here for the long run ! I don't like the coincidences tho

  • Russian guy arrested for btc money laundring / Fact: BTC-e is based in Russian
  • Running the site since 2011 / Fact: BTC-e is since then
    Rumor 66.000btc is being mixed
  • Another POV this russian guy had relations with Mt Gox fiasco so this cancels the above or not ?!

https://twitter.com/CharlieShrem/status/890254097009565697

https://twitter.com/kyletorpey/status/890253492190945285

https://twitter.com/coindesk/status/890256080965599232

http://blog.wizsec.jp/2017/07/breaking-open-mtgox-1.html

About your Polo opinion

  • Polo has a lot fake volume (due to whale friendly fees), on bittrex 100btc can move a market in no time since there are no special fees
  • Polo support sucks like Cryptsy, does this ring a bell ?
    *Polo is pumping coins before delisting , or they have insider leaks ?!
  • They disabled trollbox to improve their support , fair enough I still know some real big players complaining for unaswered support tickets.
7 years ago in #bitcoin by
$0.00
    1 vote
    Reply 3
    Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     7 years ago 

    kyletorpey Kyle Torpey tweeted @ 26 Jul 2017 - 16:52 UTC

    Source: BTC-e hacked Mt Gox. Full report coming very soon.

    CharlieShrem Charlie Shrem tweeted @ 26 Jul 2017 - 16:54 UTC

    I'm calling it: BTC-e hacked Mt Gox.

    coindesk CoinDesk tweeted @ 26 Jul 2017 - 17:02 UTC

    BREAKING @wizsecurity: Russian arrested in connection with BTC-e is "chief suspect in the MtGox theft and subsequent money laundering."

    Disclaimer: I am just a bot trying to be helpful.
    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       7 years ago 

      First of all, I want to thank you for taking the time replying to my post. I don't like these "coinsidences" too. Eventually, it seems that BTC-e has a dirty past and I agree that Polo's support sucks. Basically, there is no support there. However, in my post I wanted to emphasize in 2 things:

      1. Everytime a site is offline, many people panic. It is not unusual for this kind of sites to be offine for a maintenance, so panic is not the right way to deal with these problems.
      2. We need to find a way to trade in a safer environment and the last paragraph of my post emphasizes this need. In this spirit, I believe that OpenLedger is in the right track, but I also believe that many improvements have to take place in order to attract a bigger amount of traders.
      $0.00
        Reply
        [-]
         7 years ago 

        When harder regulations will come we will have a safer environment to trade , KYC is ok but need to KYP as well ! heh.
        I think P2P trading needs a lot of work

        $0.00
          Reply