In response to hm818. That is a loaded question. To be fair. All trading has a level of risk. The transparency is not very evident when it comes to the BCC trading bot and the multilevel marketing aspect has some critics crying foul. Those critics will also flag promoting a cloudy investment even if it is presented in a clear way. In my view if you put a down payment for a brick and mortar business you may not get it back or worse, ruin your credit and end up in debt. With BCC you can't lose more than you put in, worst case scenario ie: (shut down, crash and deactivation). They say you get your investment back and historically so far this has been the case. Users have shown proof of withdraws but no one has a crystal ball to see the future.

If an investor looks at the stability of an opportunity the reward vs the risk and only invest what they feel comfortable losing why not invest? Even fiat, in a "safe" savings account is subject to inflation. So with inflation you risk having a dollar today not being worth so much in the future. BCC has a roadmap to give use cases for their currency, but will the team be able to deliver? It all raises questions. Asking questions leads to a thought process that helps investors speculate even if the answers are not very clear. A pros and cons list could be generated if you factor in opportunity cost and probability of outcomes. According to the Stephen's dMAmapping in this post the currency itself has promise. The platform has elements of value amalgamation. Only ones PERSONAL risk tolerance can tip the scales between the decision to investing (gambling) or not. I have invested in the lending platform and it has been performing well in my case but that is just me.