You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Reputational Enhanced Delegated Proof-of-Stake (REDPOS)

Thoughts on a reputation system similar to Google's page ranking system? Users could have a place somewhere in their profile where they add links to other users that they consider trustworthy for governance. Someone with a high reputation adding a link to another user means that this second user's reputation increases. Whereas if a low-reputation user adds a link to another user, it doesn't make much difference.

How Google did it is that they manually picked a number of websites that they considered trustworthy and gave them a high reputation. And from there on, when those websites included links to other websites, then it increased those other websites' reputations. And so on it spread. We could replicate this process for user reputation. Reputation would basically be a score for "How trustworthy is this person when it comes to the governance of our platform?"

Sort:  

How Google did it is that they manually picked a number of websites that they considered trustworthy and gave them a high reputation.

Looks similar to how Ripple is decentralizing their validator nodes. Their UNL started as a 100% ripple nodes list, then they replaced one ripple server with a "trustworthy one" (on their own view) at a time, until the ripple owned servers became the minority of consensus.

Someone with a high reputation adding a link to another user means that this second user's reputation increases. Whereas if a low-reputation user adds a link to another user, it doesn't make much difference.

I like this idea, seems like the decentralized version of what Ripple or Google did. I see a good potential on that idea, if a good developer takes it.

I know @blocktrades is working on something, not sure if it's the same idea. Maybe other devs can chime in as well.