You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: AIOS (All In One Social) : Secure And Private Decentralized Social Network

in #blog7 years ago

We are going to thoroughly research these claims that @Cryptick is making on his post. However, after reaching out to him directly he was very rude. Actually, one of the rudest people we have ever met on Steemit.

It was an experience we would not like to repeat he was saying very rude and derogatory remarks about family. etc.

@Cryptick may be right about these claims but when people approach him to check about fixing those issues he is very disrespectful.

After completing our investigation in these claims he made on his post.

https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@cryptick/help-me-report-the-all-in-one-social-networks-aios-is-an-ico-scam

We will fix this Article and change it to state that it is, in fact, a SCAM but not because of this man. We have already started researching these claims and it looks like he is, in fact, right that AIOS is a Scam.

Sort:  

Why have you not updated this post since declaring you would nearly 1 full day ago? You are aiding a scam at this point.

Just because someone is rude (though you have not given proof of this) you cannot dismiss their claims.

this is exactly my concern as well. Now it is four days, and not only does this account not edit this post, it has not removed the upvotes on all the AIOS posts. This is obviously not a wise move as far as integrity goes on the Steem platform.

Indeed, quite the opposite. Thanks for putting your concern where your mouth is and flagging.

Very troubling to see.

Adsactly is painting a very poor picture of himself.

I know he has put up quality posts... But why not edit this one?? It makes no sense.

Why does this paint a bad picture on ADSactly itself? This Article was written by one of the Independent Writer with @ADSactly not sure why ADSactly should get crucified for this one post. If you will notice at the bottom we did update the post to state that we are not telling anybody to participate in AIOS. We also told people to do there own research.

Okay....I guess I have no idea what @adsactly is.

I have just seen some posts under @adsactly before.

Now I am going back and see different authors at the very bottom under different posts.

Have you written about Yourself/business? Can you send me a link so I can understand @adsactly better??

Why does it paint @adsactly poorly? There is a comment by @adsactly that admitted they think AIOS is a scam. But the POST was never edited by @adsactly for the first 5 or 6 days of the post...even though the 'admission' comment is only 1 day or less after the post itself was published. So the edit did not get done for 4, 5 or 6 days.

And since there is no disclaimer explaining the relationship between adsactly, the writers, and AIOS. It was AND IS still very confusing.

Thanks,
Peace.

It reflects poorly on your integrity. Promoting a verified scam is not something people in Steemit do. Period.

@stellabelle, please do not tell people what they can and cannot do. I believe that doing bad is bad. And scams are probably bad. But whatever happen to freedom of speech? Where do we draw the line between what is good to write and what is bad to write?

.

Maybe, this post was not the best thing to write if it is in fact a scam or too much of a scam. But a lot of things can be scams, at the same time. Are taxes a scam? Some would say taxes are scams and some would say taxes are not scams. There is a debate there. Personally, I don't like taxes. I don't like scams.

.

People who come to this post can read in the comments that this AIOS thing is a scam. That is life. That is why we have comments. The comments can disagree with the posts. But is Steemit going to try to become too much like Facebook via too much censorship? I'm asking the question but I know Steemit does not do that. I know Steemit is not Facebook. But I think the question is still important.

.

This post about AIOS was downvoted and did not get money. It got low ratings. That is basically how Steemit works. The better ideas will probably get more money. This post was probably NOT a better idea and therefore not a financial success like a movie that bombs in the box office, the cinema. That is called supply and demand, AKA Capitalism. And promoting verified scams probably shouldn't be encouraged but they will still be promoted sometimes. But the better ideas will beat the scams in the end. The better things will overcome and prevail eventually.

.

But trying to purge the world of scams would be the same as trying to get rid of poverty, bad thoughts, murder, death, sickness, cancer, fire, breakups, ice, tornadoes, terrorism, crimes, and many things. We can try to do it but it is still tough and sometimes counterproductive.

.

Too often people try to be like police. They try to come in and fix and clean up problems afterwards, as in correction. However, a better focus might be in prevention, in education, in training, in helping people make better choices before they go off to do a bad thing, to promote a scam like this AIOS thing, or others, and so on.

this is a false claim you make also on the accusations of slander towards you without any proof which seems to be common from you and others in your group.

it was @cryptick who discovered these things not @adsactly like you claim.

why wasn't research done before hand on the legitimacy of this ICO instead of posting without due diligence, the things that are questionable are fairly obvious and anyone with basic understanding in crypto should be able to spot immediately.

why would you leave post up you realize you can edit and remove until is proven legitimate what if people get scammed?

and trying to take credit for discovering the scam after flagging down the one who did is very low,
you should be rewarding that user not taking credit for the things he discovered this is called plagiarism

I know Adsactly doesn't think is so bad and have hired and support with votes a few plagiarists
but this is serious problem in for any legitimate people who actually do the hard work benefit the platform and dont depend on selfvoting stake to make money.

Link to cryptik post : https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@cryptick/help-me-report-the-all-in-one-social-networks-aios-is-an-ico-scam

I am very glad that you were able to investigate my claims further and discover that AIOS is in fact a FRAUD. It would be very interesting to know what additional information you have discovered. My sole purpose of posting was to alert people so those smarter than me could investigate and the community could come to a conclusion.

If -in any way I was rude-, I would like to apologize. I have tried to act in a civilized manner. Since we have not had private interactions, I admit ignorance as to what rude interaction took place but still please accept my sincere apology.

May I also ask that you unflag my posts?

Flagging causes less visibility. Truth is far greater than impoliteness.

We need to get truth out!

flags cannot be undone on steemit... not supported...

This is simply not true. The only time they cannot be reversed is during the last 12 hours of the payout window, which is between 6.5 and 7 days after posting. If the flag is reversed after 7 days it will have no effect on payout, since it has already paid out. But they can be reversed.

What about adsactly's flags to myself and @cryptick do they not matter because we dont have as much money?

Thank-you,
but PLEASE hurry up and change this post so that people will not invest their money into a fraudulent ICO.

Rudeness shouldn't factor in any decision making. Good on you to take the time to investigate regardless of cryptick's persona.