Alex Jones hit with sanctions by judge in Sandy Hook lawsuit - Similar to the Cyprus Problem Freedom Fighters

False flag 100%. Like the false flags they did for Edward Snowden, Wikileaks, anonymous white hat hackers and other freedom fighters.

Article about Alex Jones: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/alex-jones-hit-with-sanctions-by-judge-in-sandy-hook-lawsuit/ar-AAD4y7M?ocid=spartandhp&fbclid=IwAR1BQDpo6QLjGc6o7rOR6ZOi4RIQnNzjl0nzTw21ATgGLY_qlVNFUlhO45U

That's what happens when you always tell the bitter truth. How is it relevant to Cyprus? But how can it not be that no politician or journalist is telling the truth about the Cyprus issue and the sell-off of our oil. #freedomofspeech #antinwo #ownyourvoice

What's next? (written by Yusuf Kanlı, Cyprus, niyazi kızılyürek - Turkish opinion (the invaders of 1974 in Cyprus which is a small island in Europe)

At the end of the day perhaps conservative and nationalist Turkish Cypriots might end up thanking Akel of providing them with a very effective political tool. Already Greek Cypriot conservatives have started pointing at the very same potential “dangerous” situation. If, on May 26, some 5,600 Turkish Cypriots participated in the European Parliament election organized by the Greek Cypriot state and if according to the Greek Cypriot electoral board of the overall 200,000 eligible Turkish Cypriot voters there were at least 80,000 registered in the Greek Cypriot side as well, what if Turkish Cypriots decided to vote in the presidential vote there? If, particularly, the difference between the loser and the winner has always been a few percentage points, such an eventuality might mean the Turkish Cypriot electorate capturing the ultimate decider status in the Greek Cypriot presidential vote.

This is what we want?

We want peace and no controllment from Turkey. No One owns Cyprus and it's oils. There are no Greek and Turkish Cypriots, there are only Cypriots, according to history (Written by Dimitris M Papadakis on quora):

The term “Turkish” Cypriot is moot. It can only imply a Turkish national who is a citizen of the Cypriot Republic, not a Turk who is Cypriot, because no such thing exists. Worse yet, the term implies a “nationality” of sorts, which is impossible to accept under any definition of “nation”.

The reason for this is simple: Hardly any Turk is a national of Cyprus. Citizenship should not be conflated.

The first thing to note is that the Republic of Cyprus is a pseudostate, established to avert war and mitigate escalating tensions between Hellas and Turkey. For all intents and purposes it is a Hellenic proxy state.

It is therefore important to comprehend that there is a huge difference between being a Cypriot “Citizen” and a Cypriot Islander, hence ethnically and racially Hellenic, regardless of the religion this person may have.

The few Turks living on the Island before the invasion were primarily Turks who were there either after the Turks occupied the Island following the fall of the Byzantine Empire in the early 1500’s (tiny minority) which grew due to the occupation of Hellas by the Ottoman Turks over the following centuries, and whom the Hellenes neglected to oust after the war of independence much like the rest of Hellenes did in the mainland and other Islands, and the rest of them were Hellenes who were either directly or indirectly forced or coerced into converting to Islam, and with that their loyalty shifted over to the Turkish Ottoman Empire and then to Turkey, also.

Nonetheless, this population had dramatically declined following the Hellenic war of independence from the Turkish Ottoman empire, and prior to the invasion in 1974, these Islamic individuals was largely scattered around the Island, and numbered anywhere between 11,000 to 80,000 depending on whose census you go by, the Hellenic, the British or the Turkish one. Even counting these people is a problem because under the millet system, anyone being Muslim was considered a Turk and anyone not being Muslim was considered a Hellenas.

The Turks and Turkish government used this religious group as a pretext to “protect” them when the Hellenes living on the Island had decided to merge with the mainland under one unified state. In other words, the Turks themselves view these Islamic individuals as Turks, for they wanted to protect them from the Hellenes. Why should I or you or anyone deny them this verity? They agree that they are Turks illegally occupying lands which is not theirs, and wanted to take it yet again.

When Turkey attacked Cyprus under this pretext, these Islamic people mustered to the north where Turkey invaded, and the Hellenes abandoned their homes and went to the south. This allowed Turkey to occupy about a third of the land, a huge landmass that was disproportional to the number of Islamic individuals on the island, Turkish or not.

After the invasion, Turkey has continued to bring, illegally, more Turks, to further establish its presence, and now the population in the north reaches about 160,000 supposedly legal Turks, and another 150,000 illegal Turkish occupants. Very few of these people are a first generation on the Island, it being the case that only 40 years have passed since the invasion. In short, there is no “Turkish Cypriot” nationality or nation to be had.

In other words, it is impossible to speak of ethnic Cypriots who are actually “Turkish”. It’s like talking about a nationality called the “British Cypriots”. It’s incongruous. You can speak of Cypriots who are Muslim, perhaps, but the vast majority of Turks living on the Island, Muslim or not, are not Cypriots in any sense of the word. They are simply Turks occupying Cyprus, and that’s that, and the same applies to those very few who may have had great grandparents since the invasion of Cyprus by the Turks after the fall of the Byzantine Empire in the 1500’s. Stealing land and continuing to live on it, thanks to the inability of the one being occupied to overthrow you for a few decades or centuries because the former is powerless due to decline, does not entitle you to this land. The Hellenes were too kind to the Turks on the Island. After the revolution and liberation of Hellas from the Turkish Ottomans, they should have ousted them all, and none of this would have happened. They are paying for their kindness.

At best you can speak of a Turkish national with Cypriot citizenship. This should not be confused with “Turkish Cypriot” a term which is purposefully misleading, for there is none of those to be had. It’s like saying “French New Caledonians” in the Pacific. It’s as ridiculous as it sounds, and it’s a term that implies French national occupants of native New Caledonian nationals with a New Caledonian citizenship that they have granted to themselves.

Being Cypriot, from time immemorial entails being Hellenic, for about 6,000 years now. The various occupants from one period to another are irrelevant. By this logic, I can come and take your house and then claim it is mine, just because I stood in it for a number of hours, weeks or years, but you’d be right to stomp me in the face for my insolence and take it back, for it has been rightfully yours all along.

Your inability to take it back due to powerlessness, is irrelevant to my injustice in stealing it from you, which remains an injustice, nonetheless. It doesn’t entitle me to claim this land is mine, nor claim that I am a “native of your house” or land, for that matter.

In the case of Cyprus, I am a strong advocate of war, because any and all diplomatic resolutions have failed to produce a satisfying solution, for the only acceptable solution is eviction of those occupying land which is not theirs. When this fails, you would normally use force, and if it were your house and tenants were not leaving but even claimed that the house is theirs, police force would get them out in a matter of minutes. The same is true about the Turks occupying the Island. Using these people as a front as Turkey has, so that there is pity for the chance of a humanitarian “crisis” now that they have established a presence on the Island, is a cheap trick. Get them evicted, even by force, or in the worst case scenario make them Hellenic citizens of the Cypriot pseudostate which is a proxy state of Hellas. Any use of terms such as the ones you use (“Turkish Cypriots”) compounds the problem further.

“Our masters have not heard the people's voice for generations and it is much, much louder than they care to remember.”-V

We are all puppets,

but...
I am just a puppet who can see the strings 🤖

What Cyprus wants in 2019 is peace, according to statistics Cypriots love Turkish citizens and they go to the turkish side for food, clubbing, holidays or for their luxury casinos. The problem is not the citizens, the problem of Cyprus is the wrong people in the wrong positions.

Cypriots hope for a solution if not in 2019, at least in 2020 because Cypriots live in a nostalgia/homesickness from 1974. Cyprus is not like Syria's conflict but is worse because Cyprus is in Europe without getting any support all of these years from 2004 that Cyprus entered the European Union.

References:

1. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/alex-jones-hit-with-sanctions-by-judge-in-sandy-hook-lawsuit/ar-AAD4y7M?ocid=spartandhp&fbclid=IwAR1BQDpo6QLjGc6o7rOR6ZOi4RIQnNzjl0nzTw21ATgGLY_qlVNFUlhO45U
2. 
3. https://www.quora.com/How-different-are-Turkish-Cypriots-to-Turks
4. http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/opinion/yusuf-kanli/what-has-happened-in-cyprus-143762
5.