What would you do if you insulted someone in the crowd?

The 21st century is called the era of scientific triumph - we are accustomed to write such a test. But the recent social networking journey has started to be an innovative force. These new inventors, such as the National Disaster of 'House Breakdown and so-and-so', are in the presence of these innovators, and they are not behind the great research and propaganda of any national team like Maggie Noodles.

If these innovators designed 'troll', 'mim', they would not have been the target of critics and critics if they had targeted pure entertainment or constructive criticism. With such innovative power, a new revival of humor could have been done, but due to the tendency of personal attacks or 'bullying', it became a sick trend.

The violence of this trend by social media was new, but the history of the star or the popular people was pre-recorded or personal attacks. Popular figures did not even talk to the attackers. Even 20 years ago, Apple has replaced a brick "Patkel" instead of a brick in a conference and Steve Jobs, the founder of Pixar Animation himself.
Steve Jobs has left an excellent example. The events of 1997 After a period of resignation from his established Apple Inc. Steve returned to Apple only once again. A meeting organized by Apple for developers was the first question asked by a viewer, "Mr. Jobs, you are undoubtedly a great talented and influential person. But it's tragic and clear that you do not know exactly what you talk about. Let's give an example, say, how can you tell Java and one of its Inner Open Dock Ideas exactly how? And yes, after answering this question, please also tell you what you personally have done in the last seven years.

It was a very difficult job that Jobs did in response to a direct attack.

Took a break. And thought of silence. As a result of that silence of almost ten seconds, the whole meeting was more uncomfortable. But in a ten-second silent preparation, he chose a thick Patkel. A sip of water started to say, 'You know, you can be happy for some time for some time ....'

That is why eight seconds of uncomfortable break and silence again.

This break is actually very important. In the middle of the conversation, this break gave Job to his emotions control and the opportunity to think. This break is more important because the words that Jobs said after this time had been arranged in such a way that it would not be regret for words in future.

After the eight-second break, he said, "But when you want to make a huge change, it's really a very difficult task. Because sometimes you will have to accept this gentleman's question really. '

For many years, psychologists have said that attacking him is not a very good way to bring about change. Rather, he has to come to a common ground before. Jobs did the same thing. He accepted the charge of the questioner. Because a human can not know everything. And it is not possible to know all the details of the app as a CEO. That's what he explained after that. Simply answer, 'Just open doc why I have no idea about many more features. But it is not the last thing to make commercial app or demonymation or to keep an eye on the details of each software. There is another huge aspect here, where I have to find out how the software or app will help to sell eight or ten billion dollars of products. And in this case, you do not have to start from the technology, you have to start from the customer's demand. That is, after reviewing the demand of the customer, you can create the best technology but it is not possible to create a suitable demand by researching technology. To do something you need to walk on the opposite side of the technology from the demand. '

He did not stop because of his work, he said, how did he get this experience from his mistake. He made his own weakness power. He said, 'But I have not been able to know so much important details except that I have not seen anyone present in this room except me. I also have the mark of that mistake. ' In his own experience, in the academic career, it has been pointed out in the wake of the dropout being that in this way, two birds have killed two birds here. With increasing the credibility of his argument to everyone, he also increased the importance of his experience to stakeholders.
Jobs then added to the discussion through the praise of his colleagues. He said, 'But some people are working hard on Apple day and night. Thousands of people are working here with all their talents. In this very words, in the words of his colleagues, subordinate officers and employees, he told them that he is also beside them. Despite repeatedly answering the question of the dishonest question, Steve Jobs concludes the answer very strongly. He said, 'Anyway, it will be wrong, it will be wrong to go on the path and it is good. Because we are reaching at least some conclusions, we get some results. If we make a mistake, we will find it and we will definitely fix it.

After looking at the questioner, he said, 'So it will be wrong, some will get angry, some will not know what he is talking about, but I think we are now in a better condition than we had been a few days ago and of course more We are moving towards something good.