Sort:  

Not at all. I am not sure how you got that from this?

Oh...perhaps cause I read it?

Seems to be something missing from when I read it the first time.
Probably my imagination..

do you know much about the mises.org or Murray Rothbard, Ludwig Von Mises, FA Hayek or the other economists from that era? None were against a certain type of person or place. They were for nothing but freedom and prosperity. This is digging through those years and finding the truth in history. Written by very few historians. Quigley, Sutton and a few others notably. Questioning the narrative shouldn't make anyone anti american as you say. However it does today.

yeah yeah yeah...
I still think there's something missing from what I read and commented on the first time..

https://mises.org/library/case-revisionism-and-against-priori-history
its hilarious that instead of just saying. Oh I guess I misunderstood. You are saying I edited it. Here is the link. You can say or think whatever you would like sir. I won't have someone say I lied for no reason. It was a copy and paste straight from a website from a book.

Oh I wasn't commenting on the copy/paste.
I was commenting on your comments.. which you claim not to have made.
I guess I've learned a lesson from this little incident.

There is no comments. The first sentence is my own. That was it. Sorry for the misunderstanding. I feel like if I said the same thing on your page you would be like "wtf un-American" people like you are more american than most of the people in the US. So when I saw that I got defensive.

also I doubt you or I would edit anything based on a comment from another person. Writing truth takes a pretty thick skin.

thank you for that.
but.
from now on when I comment I'll copy/paste the part I'm commenting on.

Please do. I read it twice since we have been talking and I would like to know what you saw as well.

Loading...