Yeah, we'll see if Coindesk feels like writing about it... Maybe then something will get done. I don't think @ned wants everyone to realize what a centralized piece of shit this really is.
And honestly, it's pretty sad you don't give a shit about it.
If they die, then those top witness positions will be even more entrenched, since those votes will never decay. And this is precisely why we need decaying votes.
Yeah, we'll see if Coindesk feels like writing about it... Maybe then something will get done. I don't think @ned wants everyone to realize what a centralized piece of shit this really is.
And honestly, it's pretty sad you don't give a shit about it.
probably why he hasn't focused on marketing.
What actions must be taken in order to put us on the right path?
A witness voting system that isn't controlled by a single, inactive and malicious user.
how do we get the single, inactive, malicious user to relinquish their power?
Impossible, will never happen.
so, unless they die.... we are at their "mercy"?
That is an awful thought. If freedom becomes incapacitated in any way, the votes can remain stuck forever.
Imagine what it is like to have been living with this horrific knowledge for a couple years, like some of the rest of us.
We will always be at their mercy, even after death, unless all coins are sold. The votes will always have their impact unless they are removed.
If they die, then those top witness positions will be even more entrenched, since those votes will never decay. And this is precisely why we need decaying votes.
Now I see the importance of decaying votes.