RE: The Ultimate Cheat Sheet on Felon Education and Recidivism
I agree with you to a great extent. However, some of the jobs that are immediately available upon release are simply not going to cover a person's expenses. They don't pay a living wage.
For example, in addition to the normal expenses of living - housing, transportation, food, utilities - many of these men have court-ordered fees to pay. They must pay for the privilege of being under court supervision, some of them must pay for GPS tracking devices, often there is child support owed, and the plethora of fees and fines that are often incurred when a person is first incarcerated - unpaid parking tickets, overdue utility bills, etc.
People being released from prison will find it nearly impossible to meet the financial demands imposed on them while working at a minimum wage job. Our program provides them with a cushion; we offer housing and employment in proximity to one another.
This reduces housing costs (and stress) to nothing, and reduces transportation expenses to almost nothing. Removing those obstacles allows our participants to focus on learning their new careers and building up their clientele. While they are not starting their own business, they still must work to earn their clients.
As they begin to build their client base, a portion of their wages goes back into funding the program, a portion is set aside for them upon successful completion of the program, and the rest goes directly into their pocket to pay for daily expenses.
that is really a great program.
I just want to say this: why can't the government pay the GPS monitoring thing and the court supervision fees?
I understand the child support fees but, is it not another way of pushing these guys off the wall? I mean, with all the fees/ debts they needed to pay, its no surprise that most of them would want to revert back to crime just to get an easy way of earning....
I don't know if its right for me to suggest this but, is there a way for these costs to be delayed or if not, then decreased? Just so until they fully get back on their feet?
Sometimes the court will defer the fees, sometimes they will waive them entirely. It's largely up to the individual judge to exercise his or her discretion in each case. Some judges are known for waiving fees - some are not.
I agree with you that charging people money for the service of being under court supervision is largely detrimental. It puts an extra burden on a person who is still struggling.
I know a man who was sentenced to 5 years of court supervision. He has to submit to drug and alcohol testing weekly and pay all the fees associated with that supervision - for 5 years! He's been a model of cooperation the entire time. He has his own place to live, has a stable job, doesn't get into any trouble or do anything he isn't supposed to. He's been under supervision for 3 years already with 0 failed drug tests.
One week, his test was diluted. This can (and did) happen from drinking a lot of water. This particular man drinks a lot of water regularly. His judge promised that if his test is diluted one more time, she will send him back to prison. Now, he makes a point to NOT drink much water at all.
In the meantime, he still has to pay for the supervision.