ADSactly Cult Movies: ‘Fight Club’, Revisited
To be able to write this post I must, obviously, break the first rule of “Fight Club”, the famous ‘you don’t talk about fight club’. But I feel like I must, especially as the movie turned 20 this year. Hard to believe so much time has passed, hard to believe Brad Pitt is 20 years older…
Still, a good thing the movie got made in 1999, as I’m afraid in 2019 nobody would dare touch some of the motifs in ‘Fight Club’. Even 20 years ago, producers were very reluctant to greenlight a movie they considered ‘sinister and seditious’ from the get-go. Sinister, that’s understandable with a director like David Fincher, who gave horror a whole new meaning with ‘Seven’, one of the most brutal and brilliant movies ever.
However, I don’t think producers were that worried about gore and violence. The main issue was with the ‘seditious’ part. Violence aside, ‘Fight Club’ is a an anti-materialistic and anti-consumerism movie, something media moguls are quite unlikely to support. Their whole industry relies on consumerism, after all. Yet, with an acclaimed director and a star-studded cast - Brad Pitt, Edward Norton, Helena Bonham-Carter and Jared Leto, they decided to give it a try. Their doubts were confirmed at the box-office, where the movie flopped, while reviews were mixed, at best.
‘Fight Club’ took off to become a cult movie with its DVD release, just as we’ve seen with the other movies discussed in this series.
In many ways, the film was compared with ‘Rebel Without a Cause’, James Dean’s most famous movie, which came out in 1955. That was a movie that spoke to the post-war young generation, rebelling against an intolerable status quo. ‘Fight Club’ did the same thing for Generation X, a term used to describe those born between mid-1960s and the 1980. Basically, the first generation raised under the influence of television and the advertising industry. The people trained from a very young age to be consumers, to value the possession of useless stuff, like the Ikea furniture in the apartment of The Narrator, Edward Norton’s character. The apartment that is destroyed by an explosion early in the movie, somehow releasing The Narrator from his dependence on useless stuff.
The other main character, played by Brad Pitt, is a symbol of the same consumerist society, as Tyler Durden is a soap salesman, as unlikely as such job might seem.
It is only very late in the movie that the viewers realize Tyler Durden is just a projection of the unnamed Narrator, the persona he wishes to be, a free man who sets out to destroy a stifling society with his Project Mayhem. Tyler tells the Narrator:
‘All the ways you wish you could be, that's me. I look like you wanna look, I am smart, capable, and most importantly, I am free in all the ways that you are not.’
The ‘fight clubs’ Durden and the Narrator established are meant to be a (violent) release from all the constraints of the the society they live in. A return to primeval urges. They’re men, they fight each other. Actually, this is one of the reasons I don’t think such a movie would be released today. Or if it did, it would be entirely different. These days Hollywood is all about feminism and the characters in the movie are a clear example of what some decry as ‘toxic masculinity’. At best, a movie made today would drop any idea of justified rebellion and vilify the men in the movie as animals that need to be neutered. In doing my research, I’ve come across posts comparing the characters in the movie to members of the so-called alt-right. Obviously, today’s snowflake generation would not condone of such violence.
Take for instance, the following quote, from Chuck Palahniuk’s 1996 novel, on which the movie is based:
‘You are not special. You’re not a beautiful and unique snowflake. You’re the same decaying organic matter as everything else. We’re all part of the same compost heap. We’re the all-singing, all-dancing crap of the world.’
Seriously, try telling one of today’s millennials they’re not special and unique and you’ll have them running to their safe-space for a nice cry.
Yet, the main ideas in ‘Fight Club’ still ring true today, even if Palahniuk could not have anticipates the world of social media and its devastating effects, making us even more vain and materialistic than in the 1990s.
‘We’re the middle children of history, man. No purpose or place. We have no Great War. No Great Depression. Our Great War’s a spiritual war, our Great Depression is our lives. We’ve all been raised on television to believe that one day we’d all be millionaires, and movie gods, and rock stars. But we won’t. And we’re slowly learning that fact. And we’re very, very pissed off.’
The quote above can be found today on many sites and forums dedicated to ‘Fight Club”, and there’s plenty of them out there.
Palahniuk once said“A good story should change the way you see the world”and many believe ‘Fight Club’ is that sort of revolutionary story.
Ten years after its original release, ‘The New York Times’ proclaimed ‘Fight Club’ “the defining cult movie of our time”.
One of the parts of Tyler Durden’s Project Mayhem was blowing up all the buildings holding financial details, especially about credit cards, so all debts would be erased. Yes, the means to this end are very violent, but it’s easy too see how so many people would find the idea of being debt-free quite appealing.
Post authored by @ladyrebecca
References:1, 2.
Click the coin below to join our Discord Server
)
A great cult movie, @ladyrebecca. In particular, I thought it was great! As you well point out, its popularity may be due to the reflections it proposes on society and its way of life. Who hasn't felt desperate and can't find a way out of the routine that consumes him? Who has not felt anger for the powerful, for what surrounds us? Who has not felt that he works alone to buy things he does not need and that make us more miserable, falling into a vicious circle?
Many have affirmed that The Fighting Club is a critical reflection about the consumer society in which we live and the effects it has on individuals. Thank you for sharing this post.
One of the reasons I wrote this post is the fact that I feel kinda stuck lately and I wish I could break the routine. Well, one day... :)
This is one of the best reviews I have read in years. It is very well written and well researched. It praises the movie turning very attractive to those who don't know it, while showing all rhe ramifications of its complex premise.
I did not like Fight Club that much, but I can see its appeal. Like fighting, boxing, and many other violent attractions, there is some vicarious pleasure I don't need to experience.
I do praise the underlying critique to an allienating society that 20 years later fulfilled its promise.
As you rightly point out, tday's is a "snowflake generation" and so much political correctness and oversensitivity are not going to right the wrong; on the contrary, they'll worsened the "evils" they were meant to fence off or even obliterate.
The movie has been quite influential, no doubt, but as you remark the violent means by which the end should be achieved may be hard to channel these days
This obviously brings Mr Robbot to mind. I think that corporations and complacent legislators have made it very easy for oppressed majorities to conceive destructive plans against unscrupulous magnates.
Thanks for the nice words! Truth is writing this review kinda made me want to rewatch the movie, as much of my belief system has changed since I last saw it.
This movie is so timeless you can watch it again and again and year after year and the messaging still resonates!
I often go back to the we the middle child of history quote! We have no Great War, our Great War is our lives!
It still amazes me to this day how we went from trying to meet our needs to being these consumer black holes just gobbling up the next trend
Posted using Partiko iOS
I guess we could say we are fighting for survival in a world that's set out against us, the common people. On some other levels, I'd say we're fighting for our humanity even.... but, for a Great War, I wouldn't rule that out. It takes so little to start a major war and there's so much profit to be made from one.
David Fincher seemed to me for a long time to be one of the most promising Hollywood filmmakers, for his courage and lucidity. Then I was made, which usually happens, a director who folds to the conveniences of the market. "Seven" still seems to me to be a first-rate production, his most successful film to date, both in terms of subject matter and narrative. It's true that The Fighting Club is presented to us as a realization that, under its apparent approval of a nihilistic life, exerts a harsh criticism of the generation, let's call it "postmodern" in one of its extremes: gratuitous and masochistic violence, bordering on narcissism (in this sense, it resembles "Crash* of another David, Cronenberg, made three years before Fincher's film) and the society that feeds it.
But there is a previous film, between Seven and The Fighting Club that I found extremely interesting, although also a box-office failure like TFC; its title The Game. I haven't seen it again (it's a pending task). So, I considered it a very intelligent film, with a very uncomplacent plot and narrative proposal, with some metafictionality.
Thank you for your good critical review of this important contemporary film, @ladyrebecca.
i lokk this movie
Hi, @adsactly!
You just got a 0.37% upvote from SteemPlus!
To get higher upvotes, earn more SteemPlus Points (SPP). On your Steemit wallet, check your SPP balance and click on "How to earn SPP?" to find out all the ways to earn.
If you're not using SteemPlus yet, please check our last posts in here to see the many ways in which SteemPlus can improve your Steem experience on Steemit and Busy.