Is Man Made Global Warming a serious issue?

in #climate8 years ago (edited)


I don't deny there is a over all warming going on, but evidence shows it has been happening for a long time, even before humans existed, and sure man has added to it, but at such an insignificant rate that it is meaningless to bring up. The last two prior centuries even show this, with the temperature only raising 0.86 degrees Celsius, and during the last century it was 0.6 degree Celsius, that is very small fractional difference to the prior centuries.

Another fact to look at is Solar and Volcanic activity, such as the increase of solar flares, and observations with simulations from an energy balance climate model indicate that as much as 41 to 64% of preanthropogenic (pre-1850) decadal-scale temperature variations was due to changes in solar irradiance and volcanism. Solar total and ultraviolet (UV) irradiances are reconstructed annually from 1610 to the present. The correlation of reconstructed solar irradiance and Northern Hemisphere (NIl) surface temperature is 0.86 degrees Celsius in the pre-industrial period from 1610 to 1800, implying a predominant solar influence. Extending this correlation to the present suggests that solar forcing may have contributed about half of the observed 0.55 degrees Celsius surface warming since 1860 and one third of the warming since 1970.

During the 60's-70's there was Global cooling propaganda being spread, then in the 80'-90' they called it Man Made Global Warming, which today now they call climate change because their science models always fail, in fact scientist are even claiming there is a small ice age coming in the future, I'll wait to see the evidence of that when it actually shows up, but it seems most of these climate agendas are merely to grant Governments control to do what they please, such as placing irrelevant statutes on the people, such as carbon taxes, which they fail to understand that carbon is a the building block of all life, it is vital for plant growth, and in fact during the prehistoric ages, CO2 was at it's peak. Most Government are attempting to blame CO2 for historical warming, yet what scientist find is that CO2 does go up when it warms, but it follows warming, it doesn't precede it.

The fact is the supposed 97% of scientist that agreed on Global Warming, was in a survey of just 77 scientists, which were hand picked by the U.N. for having authored an article about man made global warming. With that kind of cherry picking you have to ask yourself why they couldn't hit 100%, that would have been all 77 instead of 75. What is also completely absent from that study is the existence of a petition signed by over 30,000 scientists stating that they do not agree with the claims of the alarmists. Together that 97% becomes much much less and not even close to 1%.

Conclusion: There is no real empirical evidence proving that man made Global Warming does anything to change the climate significantly at all, until there is more data to show this, people should just ignore the propaganda put on by the State, it is a political stunt used to get attention and to make false claims, most likely it is to try to claim that they are saving the planet, while being hypocritical in practice, and most likely to cover up other issues they don't want the masses to see.

Sort:  

If everything follow the cycles of the past there is a mini ice age that has started. Yes there are changes. They are the changes of a mini ice age. We should not pollute the air so much anyhow.
Have a nice day everyone.

I never claimed there wasn't any pollution, yet the pollution has little to do with Global warming, as my article clearly shows, but the fact is pollution is an issue on some environmental damages, although the earth can and will repair itself in time, the fact is pollution does cause issues for the way of life, from GMOs to oil leaks, and lets not forget radiation fall outs such as Chernobyl and Fukushima or also the mines fires in multiple places around the world that life can not be sustainable. The biggest culprits of pollution, is that of the Governments, yet they do nothing to resolve the issues they cause, which you can not expect them to take responsibility for actions they deny, this should be a property rights issue at best, especially if someone pollutes and affects your way of life, yet again most pollution has less to do with global warming and more of an environmental issue.

I agree totally. Thank you for the reply :-)

Climate change is something to worry about simply because it affects us. Whether or not it's our fault doesn't matter when nature starts rising up against us with extreme weather, rising water levels and such.
Also, I think taking better care of the environment is a good thing in its own right. Less polution means better air/water/food quality, which leads to healthier people.

The Climate changes all the time, this is a fact, we as humans have little affect on changing it for the good or bad, to think we can is being nothing less than narcissistic. It is true in time the Climate will continue to change to the point that humans and other life would not be able to exist here on earth, but that is out of our hands as humans, any Government interference would just cause the human demise to move on faster, because every regulation and statute passed by governments telling people they can not do something to make life easier, will created a retardation in the growth of advancement in many things, such as technology and the natural way of life through economical means.

Congratulations @termtrip! You have received a personal award!

Happy Birthday - 1 Year on Steemit Happy Birthday - 1 Year on Steemit
Click on the badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.

For more information about this award, click here

By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how here!