Conspiracy Challenge #001, Moon – 16% Rewards

alexs1320 (71)in #conspiracy • 7 years ago

Greetings to all Steeminas, we come in peace!

I'm announcing my first challenge where Science meets Conspiracy.

I'm an open-minded person and also scientist who really like to listen, as sometimes conspiracies are right.

In the worst case scenario, we will have some fun thinking about interesting ideas. And we will earn some Steem, thus it's a win-win situation for all of us.

The rules of the Challenge

Ask me a question in the comment section.
One concise question. For example, „shadows are wrong because of that“, not „shadows are wrong, hills are wrong, radiation is not survivable...“.
One single question, the best one.
Upvote the post
And resteeem it
Deadline is 7 days from now, when the voting on this post expires

Rewards

The best question will get 10% of SBD earned in this post
Second best will be awarded with 5%
And the third best question will get 1% of SBD earned by this post

image source

I will try to answer all the questions as soon as possible

if I don't know, I will ask my colleagues who know more than me

image source

#fiction #space #moon #steem

7 years ago in #conspiracy by alexs1320 (71)

$0.51

Sort:

Trending

[-]

kryzsec (59) 7 years ago

Yes, so the apollo mission used film and it is quite known that X-rays, gamma rays, and cosmic rays will hit film and activate it (creating an image) So my question is why aren't there stars in the photo of the horizon? Because we can tell the exposure would be on long enough based on blurred reflections and even if it weren't there should be exposure marks where stray radiation his the film (even through its protective capsule) and neither of those are present

This is 1 question about why the exposure of radiation to the film isn't present (including exposure from visible light) when it should be. The answer is known, I just saw that you haven't had any answers.

$0.00

[-]