Apollo 11 Moon Landing - Why No Crater below the Lunar Module?

The following summary comes from SCALED LUNAR MODULE JET EROSION EXPERIMENTS. Source link listed below.

“An experimental research program was conducted on the erosion of particulate sur¬ faces by a jet exhaust. These experiments were scaled to represent the lunar module (LM) during landing. A conical cold-gas nozzle simulating the lunar module nozzle was utilized. The investigation was conducted within a large vacuum chamber by using gravel or glass beads as a simulated soil. The effects of thrust, descent speed, nozzle terminal height, particle size on crater size, and visibility during jet erosion were determined."

"Results indicate that, from an erosion and visibility standpoint, the best landing mode for a lunar module type of vehicle would involve: site inspection and selection above the incipient erosion height, and a fast descent to the highest drop-in altitude that the vehicle structure could withstand. A slow and cautious descent with hovering just above the lunar surface would greatly increase crater size and impair visibility.”

Here is the video from NASA, which shows that a crater would have formed.

NASA Concept Art of Apollo 11 Mission:

Werner Von Braun

Apollo 11 Post Flight Press Conference

Commentary from YouTube Channel:
"The crew of Apollo 11 nervously, reluctantly, and with the emotion of a eulogy, present their first press conference . . . with the aid of teleprompters discretely hidden in the desk, in order to help them remember their one of kind experience, that the writers of their script should know nothing about."

"Notice at time 1:04:53 that Neil Armstrong is asked whether or not he remembered seeing any stars in the lunar sky, a subject the crew was apparently asked to avoid as the correct astrological positions of the constellations were too difficult to simulate in the fake lunar backgrounds. Armstrong then wrongly replies with "I don't recall", to which Aldrin grimaces in discomfort at his error (as if one would forget such an important detail that they witnessed first hand in their alleged universally unique experience). To help Armstrong recover from being tripped up by this difficult question, crew member Michael Collins offered assistance by interjecting "I don't remember seeing any." The problem is, he forgot that he wasn't even there! (It was Buzz Aldrin who supposedly walked on the moon with Armstrong, not Collins!)"

"Apparently when all three orbited the earth together for eight days in a relatively small space capsule (never actually leaving earth orbit, much less landing on the moon), Michael Collins' experience of the mission (though he was alleged to have stayed behind orbiting the moon while Armstrong and Aldrin walked on the surface) was exactly identical to that of his teammates. As such, he instinctively chimed in at this point in the interview in an attempt to smooth over the rough spot in the conversation, forgetting temporarily that he never was supposed to have been on the moon's surface in the first place!"

"In the official transcript of this rare press conference (which, until this video release, was the only way of knowing what was said at that time), lightening struck twice in the exact same place! At the very moment where Collins misspoke, there is also a "transcription error" as well! In the official NASA record (the transcript) the government made a desperate and lame attempt to cover-up Collin's revealing mistake by attributing his remark "I don't remember seeing any (stars)" to Aldrin!"

No Stars Clip

However, to the defense of the Apollo astronauts, modern day Tesla genius Eric Dollard gives his explanation regarding what the sun isn't and the lack of stars seen in space. This blog isn't about the sun, but in free space Eric Dollard states that you cannot view the sun in free space because the lack of gross matter around the 4 minute mark.

Area 51 Scientist Ed Slade

I have listened to both of these very long interviews. Unfortunately, I do recall exactly where it was said, but Mr. Slade stated that we didn't use liquid propulsion to land on the moon, but anti-gravity. He was one of the men who designed the lunar engines. If true, then that would explain that there was no crater below the Lunar module.

Neil Armstong almost dies in crash

The Eagle has Landed

I believe we have been to the moon, but with more advanced technology. The post press conference showed lack of excitement, sadness, regret, and secrecy. I find it to be very odd behavior. Then there is Buzz Aldrin's bouts with alcoholism and depression after his famous landing on the moon. It makes no sense to me, unless he was very ashamed and depressed about living a lie about something.

And lastly, the cryptic message by Neil Armstrong:

Sources:
SCALED LUNAR MODULE JET EROSION EXPERIMENTS
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19690013268.pdf

Rage Against the Machine Bassist Gives Band Update, Talks ISIS, Trump
Wakrat co-founder Tim Commerford also discusses faked moon landing and Zack de la Rocha's in-progress album
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/rage-against-the-machine-bassist-gives-band-update-talks-isis-trump-20151002

https://science.ksc.nasa.gov/mirrors/images/html/apoll_ov.htm

https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/5779145/Buzz-Aldrin-the-dark-times-that-followed-that-historic-flight.html