Big Pharma Paid Millions in Secret Settlements After Antidepressants Linked to Mass Murder
Every time there are reports of a mass shooting, there are a number of people who automatically question whether the suspect had mental health issues or was taking prescription medications such as antidepressants.
While history has shown that the most notorious mass shooters in this century were taking antidepressants or Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) before they carried out the deadly rampages, there are a number of killings that have been linked directly to the dangerous drugs. In fact, the pharmaceutical companies behind the most popular SSRI's have paid hundreds of millions of dollars in damages:
Eli Lilly Paid Secret Settlements to Survivors After Man on Prozac Went on Shooting Rampage in 1989
Joseph T. Wesbecker, 47, carried out a mass shooting in which he shot 20 workers at Standard Gravure Corp. in Kentucky, in September 1989. Eight of the victims were fatally wounded, and Wesbecker ended the rampage by shooting and killing himself.
Just one month earlier, Wesbecker had started taking the antidepressant Prozac, which included side effects such as “obsession with suicide and dangerously violent behavior,” according to an article in the American Journal of Psychiatry.
When the survivors of the shooting filed a lawsuit against Eli Lilly arguing that it had known about the propensity of Prozac to cause violent outbursts and suicidal tendencies, the company convinced the victims to agree to secret settlements outside of court.
GlaxoSmithKline Paid $6.4 Million to the Family of a Man Who Murdered Three Family Members Hours After Taking Paxil in 1998
Donald Schell, 60, was prescribed the antidepressant Paxil to treat depression in Wyoming in February 1998. Within hours of taking the first dosage, he burst into a fit of rage and fatally shot his wife, Rita; their daughter, Deborah Tobin; and their 9-month-old granddaughter, Alyssa.
Schell then shot and killed himself. His remaining family members filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the pharmaceutical company behind Paxil, and they were awarded $6.4 million based on “the company's failure to sufficiently warn doctors and patients that the effects of the drug could include agitation and violence.”
GlaxoSmithKline Also Paid $3 Million to the Widow of a Man Who Committed Suicide After Taking Paxil in 2010
Stewart Dolin, 57, was working as a corporate attorney in Illinois when he was prescribed the generic version of the antidepressant Paxil for depression and anxiety. While taking the drug, he committed suicide by jumping in front of a Chicago Transit Authority train.
His widow, Wendy Dolin, filed a lawsuit against GlaxoSmithKline, arguing that the company failed to warn her husband's doctor that the drug he was being prescribed would increase his risk of suicidal behavior, which led to his death.
"This for me has not just been about the money. This has always been about awareness to a health issue, and the public has to be aware of this," Wendy Dolin told the Chicago Tribune after she was awarded $3 million in compensation.
While the cases mentioned above are notable because they received significant media attention, there is still an overwhelming number of lawsuits that stemmed from cases in which pharmaceutical companies paid millions of dollars for failing to warn doctors that the antidepressants they were prescribing could drive patients to kill themselves and others.
According to reports, the first lawsuit involving a Paxil suicide case went to trial in 2001, and since then, GlaxoSmithKline has paid more than $390 million in settlements or verdicts for Paxil-related cases. If that is the price they are willing to pay, then the profit they are making off of the controversial drug must be incredible.
Just not seeing the connection here, I'm pretty sure some gun is to blame. Even in the train incident...
Seriously though, thank you for the post. Clearly the mainstream outlets have a conflict of interest when it comes to these pharmaceutical companies. Thankfully there seems to be an increasing number of people turning away from these "news" companies and beginning to find other sources for information not swayed by corporate sponsorship.
Luckily, the idea that these medications are entirely safe is beginning to crumble. Those of us who've been paying attention have long pointed out the relationship between mass murder and some sort of psychotropic medication. This was almost never reported in the mainstream. But, thanks to a group of people in the alternative media, they can no longer ignore it.
So how can it be determined whether it is the medication itself causing these problems or the underlying reason they were on the medication in the first place?
The medication allows you to ignore it until it festers into something worse, pay me now or more later, it is the underlying unprocessed emotion that is the cause. We must look to the root to find the solution, everything else is just a placebo, but some have deadly side-effects.
True depression usually isn't just about "unprocessed emotion", often it is a chemical imbalance, hormone problem, thyroid problem or something else entirely. And I would say that those that commit murder or even suicide are in the distinct minority of those who take these medications. I think this issue is a whole lot more complicated than just "if you take an antidepressant you are going to kill someone or yourself". Clearly these medications don't help everyone to whom they are prescribed and for some it causes harm, but then that is true of every medication. That doesn't mean they don't help people.
This is definitely something that needs more study but to dismiss these medications as something that no one should take would probably do more harm than good.
That's what is so fucked up, to solve the problem above they didn't change anything but the warning label to include "may cause suicidal thoughts or actions" and then every time one of these people goes on a killing spree they talk about the guns because the media and our politicians are paid by the pharmaceutical companies not only to keep their mouths shut but also to scapegoat legal guns instead. Smith and Wesson does not advertise on the evening news. Can you help me free some victims of socialism?
Very interesting post!!!
See all your stories posted very beautiful
I like your post. I am your disciple. You can follow me
Talk to all your life
Such a shame that pharmacy is using techniques such as bribes to cover their tracks. I know that making a madicine is a costly business but I find it very unethical.
Hi tftproject ,
I found an article with similar content here:
Bunga yang sangat indah
This is because you likely copy and pasted some form of content --
whether it be your own or not. This is not an accusation of wrongdoing,
but merely an informative comment for the reader.
If you get repeated warnings we will start to flag all tftproject posts!
I just heard Trump say the other day that we should consider giving drug dealers the death penalty. I wonder if that applies to the CEO's of these pharm companies.... ? Food4thought.