Sort:  

Accurate. Response accepted as a qualifying submission.

Don't forget you can also earn points by scoring the clarity and helpfulness of other qualifying responses.

I rate this response 5. It is completely accurate, however I feel each FAQ should contain the necessary information as a stand alone response - Reference to rshares could be confusing to a new member or potential member.

I am going to give this a 3 only cause it isn't written as a stand-alone answer. Saying it was already mentioned is like telling the person you should already know this when it could be the first question they came to.

Rating 3, should be a stand alone answer.

4 clarity point

Already mentioned on where? Also, rshares is not commonly known even among Steemians.