You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Something Doesn't Add Up About This Coronavirus
You do great work sourcing and citing, and I appreciate it greatly.
I have a question regarding dates. You point out the outbreak started the week of Dec. 12 - 19. I have read conflicting information regarding the Event 201 simulation, with some statements that it ended in Dec. If that information is correct, the actual pandemic followed not shortly after the simulation, but immediately. If that is true, it's chilling indeed. Given Johns Hopkins criminal history, I find the odds far too slim that the simulation and the actual eruption aren't correlated in fact, as well as time.
Thanks!
I'll admit, I was sorting through so much conflicting data when trying to research this that the possibility that I got something wrong is rather high. The dates I listed were based on the "official story," which even the Chinese Government admitted was only a guess (never mind the fact that I trust the CPC even less than most governments in the first place).
These dates have since then been called into question, and so has the idea that it began near the seafood market. The Lancet published a study showing that the first infection was on 1 December, and of the first four patients infected, 3 had no connection to the market in question. This, along with the timing of Event 201, and the fact that this suspicious biotech lab owned by RLWS is so near to the same area, forms a chilling trio of facts indeed.
And it's funny you mention Johns Hopkins' history, because how convenient that they are the ones with a ready-made online tracker to keep tabs on the progress of the virus.
Suspiciously convenient indeed! Who better than the executioners to reckon the number of their victims? Still, I shall prefer the sound evidence and data you and other reliable reporters provide to my rank speculations. Your personal familiarity with China and it's damnable corruption and incapability to undertake reasonable quality standards strongly informs my understanding of the present threats from that vector. The old saw about ascribing to malevolence what is most likely incompetence seems hardly to matter in China. Either way the results are today existentially consequential.