🚩 Etherparty Analysis Part 3: Team & Funding

in #crypto7 years ago

Etherparty Analysis Part 3: Team & Funding

For the analysis of Etherparty, I will be posting several smaller parts where I focus on one thing, such as: project, team, funding, road map, et cetera. By doing this, I can get the information to you faster so that we can have discussion sooner. In addition, I think the posts will be easier to read. After releasing all the parts, I will also post the entire analysis and a summary.


etherparty


Previous parts:

In the previous parts of this series I went over the basics (the project, token and where to buy it) as well as the road map. In this part I will look into the team and how the project is funded.

The Etherparty Team

On their website, Etherparty lists 24 people (and 1 dog) under 'Team'. However, 5 of those 24 people are 'Advisors'. This is important to note because they are not actually team members - they do not actually work for Etherparty. You can take a look at the LinkedIn pages of the people listed as Advisors and you'll see that they haven't even listed Etherparty on their LinkedIn pages. I think it's slightly misleading that Etherparty lists these people under the heading Team, although this seems to be common practice in crypto.

I was going to mention that the team is actually quite big and that with six developers, they have a lot more people working on the project compared to other crypto's. Then, while researching the team's LinkedIn pages, I found a company called Vanbex Group. Take a look at their About / Team page, doesn't it look familiar?

I then found this article on the Vanbex Website:

The Vanbex Group is pleased to announce the closing of its seed round of financing for the development of blockchain-based products, including Etherparty, the company’s easy-to-use smart contract creator. Vanbex raised CAD 500,000 (USD 365,474), in line with the company’s target for its initial seed round.

In short: Etherparty is one of the blockchain projects started by Vanbex Group. Vanbex Group seems to be the employer as opposed to Etherparty itself and people working at Vanbex Group get assigned to the Etherparty project and presumably other projects as well. A similar concern came up while analysing Request Network. The team seems to be quite big, but we can be sure that they're not all working full-time on the Etherparty project.

How is Etherparty funded?

As mentioned earlier, Etherparty had received 500.000 CAD in seed funding from Vanbex Group in June. Then there was a pre-crowdsale of FUEL tokens in September and a crowdsale in October. A billion FUEL tokens were created and allocated as follows:

  • 80% was sold in pre-crowdsale and crowdsale
  • 10% reserved by the company for beta testers, strategic partners and community incentives
  • 5% sold directly on the platform
  • 5% distributed to the Etherparty team

Compared to other projects, the percentage allocated to 'community' is quite small. Where Request Network is trying to build an ecosystem and get others to develop extensions on their platform, Etherparty is trying to build it all themselves. In a way, this makes sense because the way the FUEL token is structured, there's no incentive for Etherparty to get others involved (since FUEL tokens don't get burned or used, so the circulating supply will always be 1 billion).

Looking at the funding, I strongly get the feeling that Etherparty chose to create the FUEL token not because it was necessary for users to use their application, but because it would make raising funds much easier. Raising funds traditionally from a crowdfunding or a series A would likely results in much less funding than by creating a token and selling it in a crowdsale.

What do you think of the team?
Do you think Etherparty's 'Team' page is misleaing?
How about the funding allocation and the FUEL token?
Let me know in the comments!

Part four, the final part of this series, will be coming soon! Stay tuned.



Please consider upvoting and resteeming my posts!

Thanks!
-longcat

longcat

Sort:  

This is the type of analysis needed when looking at projects. This post, combined with your other two posts on Etherparty.

Having worked on a project I think their token distribution was fair. Also, the advisors thing is typical. We had agreements with advisors from all over the world, many whom were friends eager to lend their expertise.

Thanks! There will be one final part where I go over the economics of the token and the competitors.

I'm not really against having advisors, but I think it's misleading to represent them as team members. IMO, it would be better to list a core team and an advisory board or whatever.

The token distribution is fine as it is, but just irks me because in part 1 and 2 I already got the feeling that the token does not add value to the project. I feel a lot of companies are hopping on the crypto bandwagon in order to get easy money from investors.

I agree it should be clearly stated who the core team is vs. the advisory board.

I am totally fine with ICOs even though I stay away from them. We need the tech developed and pushed forward as quickly as possible before Govs. and Banks try put the breaks on it. A majority of projects will fail, but the world changing ones won't. I was in SF during the Dot.com boom and this is just like that, but global. It's incredibly exciting to say the least.

BTW, do you know who Chris Burniske is? He has some great opinions on evaluating projects.

No, I haven't heard of Chris Buriske before. Found his Medium page after a quick Google search. Anything in particular I should read?

His cryptoassets valuation formula is very interesting https://medium.com/@cburniske/cryptoasset-valuations-ac83479ffca7

Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by longcat from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, theprophet0, someguy123, neoxian, followbtcnews, and netuoso. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows. Please find us at the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.

If you would like to delegate to the Minnow Support Project you can do so by clicking on the following links: 50SP, 100SP, 250SP, 500SP, 1000SP, 5000SP.
Be sure to leave at least 50SP undelegated on your account.

Thanks for your insight longcat! At the moment I'm researching other coins, and haven't got funds for ether party. But I'll follow you so who knows what could happen. Upvoted!

Thanks! Wouldn't recommend Etherparty for now.. 1 part to go and then I'll give the verdict (along with full post & summary). I'm a lot more positive about Request Party (previous analysis).