Bitcoin and the Language of Currency
Language is such a fascinating subject. How people learn language, how children learn language, how we interact with people who use a different language, these are all fascinating subjects to me. I tend to view the world around me with language as a starting point.
So what can language teach us about Bitcoin and other alternative currencies? Well first, we have to understand what currency is. Currency is a language. It’s a language that we use to communicate to others how valuable we find something. Basic bartering is a simple language. I have two goats, you have three barrels of fish. I need a barrel of fish, you need a goat. If the barrel of fish is worth the loss of a goat to me, I am willing to trade my goat for your barrel of fish. Conversely, if a goat is worth the loss of a barrel of fish to you, then you are willing to trade your fish for my goat. It’s a simple language. But it’s limited. What happens if a goat isn’t worth a barrel of fish? What if it takes you three weeks to get a barrel of fish, but it has taken me three years to get a goat?
That’s where the language of currency comes in. Currently, in the US, we speak the language of Federal Reserve Notes. That’s what language our currency is in. So when we look at using Bitcoin, or precious metals, or shiny beads, or whatever language you want to use for currency, we have to look at the idea that as a whole, as a society, we have to learn a brand new language.
So how do people learn language? Well, there are a couple of ways. Children, babies, people learning a brand new language with nothing else to go on have an advantage. They don’t know a language. And our brains are sort of fickle about language. We really only like to know one. In fact, it takes dedicated, patient effort to be able to be fluent in more than one language. And so when adults, who have already learned a language, begin to learn a new one, they use translation. They take a new word in a new language and they teach their brain to associate it with a word that they already know. For example, as an English speaker, if I wanted to learn French, I would begin by learning words in French that I can translate for my brain into English. I would begin to learn that bonjour means hello, and so on. I have to begin by putting it in a perspective my brain can already understand. Eventually, over time, I can begin to understand that language without having to translate it, but it takes time
Translation to a language you already know is a vital part of learning a new language. It is in fact, the first step. I don’t know any language teacher that would ridicule a person for learning a new language by translation. “Oh that’s no good, you’re only learning what the French words mean in English, that’s not learning French!” This is a ridiculous statement that doesn’t even need explaining. However, you find that exact sentiment used so often when people are learning a new language in currency. “Oh Bitcoin, that’s useless, people only base it’s value off the FRN, it’s not a real currency.” It’s the same idea, only one would be met with the rolling of the eyes and incredulity, and the other is viewed as a valid point. But it is not a valid point.
People all over the globe are beginning to learn a new language of currency. And at first, they will use translation to understand what that language means. They only know the language of currency as FRN. And so, when learning a new currency, it is helpful to say “well, x amount of Bitcoin equals y amount of FRN.” This helps people because we are all so fluent in FRNs that we know that 5 FRNs is equal to a hamburger, or whatever. But we don’t know how many Bitcoin equal a hamburger. Or how many hamburgers equal a bitcoin. And instead of going through and learning every single product’s new value, we use translation. It’s cheating, sure, but it’s a vital first step in learning a new language. So please, be patient as we all learn a new language. We’re going to mess up. We’re going to conjugate our verbs incorrectly, or in the case of the language of currency, we’re going to quote prices in BTC wrong. But as with every new language student, the joy is not in the failures, it’s in the beautiful new way the world opens up to those with a diverse grasp on the many languages that humans speak and use. We are literally creating a new language and trying to teach it to the world, before we’re even fluent in it ourselves. And if it fails, if no one wants to learn it, or if it is not sufficiently thought out and is impractical, it can still teach us so so much about the language of currency, and what it takes to structure a new currency. And that is more than enough reason to use it, be inspired by it, and encourage it.
Ki Vick
2013
It's only a valid point in this context, where you ascribe currency the attributes of language.
In real world, currency is only a commodity, it is not currency. By that statement I mean that currency is money, and money is a measure of value/a system to measure value with, but a measure or a metric is not what money is anywhere, money is only a commodity just like currency, and not a metric or system, it has no standards, the units are subject to supply and demand(wrap your head around that), a metric is an abstraction that is used in the real world to measure, as money is by definition, but by utility, actually it is only a commodity. So when the statement “Oh Bitcoin, that’s useless, people only base it’s value off the FRN, it’s not a real currency.” is uttered even though it is intended to imply that FRN are a real currency and they denominate a real degree of value it actually makes it a valid/true statement: Bitcoin is another commodity, it has scarcity and it stores value, it ascribes to the laws of supply and demand which you ascribed to currency, to and precious metals, and barrels of fish, goats, it is value itself, it only stores value, it has no worth outside a store of value and is not in fact currency at all, it is not a system to measure value any more than a rope is a system to measure length with, or a container is a system to measure volume with, it is only a store of value, it is only rope, it is only a container, not a system or metric to measure with, which is an abstract implying a universally accepted and constant unit to measure with, which money is not, it is bounded by the rules of supply and demand, saying that no matter how much rope or containers you have it won't change the units that are ascribed universally to length or volume.
www.bibocurrency.com
And yet the price network of the market conveys information. It is thus a language describing supply, demand, individual value preferences, and more.