‘Blockchain’ Doesn’t Have to Mean Cryptocurrency

The year is 2019, and every time I read a whitepaper for some new blockchain platform featuring a glamorous ICO, I think to myself: why?

gogodoge.gif

Surely not just a cynical cash grab?

Networks built on blockchains are intended to be decentralised and tamper-proof. The most obvious implementation of this tech is in digital currencies, hence the inseparability of ‘blockchain’ and ‘crypto’.

Because DLT networks typically use impervious tokens to perform transactions, it’s a simple matter to just foster a connection between them and Real World Value Tokens (aka money).

But it doesn’t have to be that way. If you set up a homebrew network in your dorm room with a stack of Rasperry Pi’s and a custom blockchain and call it DudeCoin, and proceed to simply send nonsense messages between the nodes whilst dozily mining blocks, you haven’t made a currency per se, despite having technically stockpiled a supply of crypto-tokens.

So in 2019, I’m frustrated because the biggest blockchain gaming dApps are pretty lame. They’re basically veiled currency exchanges. Developers seem to be obsessed with the idea of incorporating granular monetisation into their projects - ‘this game is built on a blockchain and uses this currency to perform every minute action!’.

All too often, as elucidated in the link above, the tech is utilised in the most pointless fashion.

solidhodl.gif
So where's the value in crypto?

We don't actually know yet. Cryptocurrency markets now behave much in the same way as financial markets with a few caveats.

A major one is the prominence of the 'noob investor', aka. retail investor, who often bring a final last-gasp pump into a coin after smart money is preparing to exit, which leaves new buyers 'holding the bag' for the harsh correction that usually follows.

Something that everyone should be aware of is the highly volatile and unsound nature of cryptocurrency speculation. Normal financial markets are, whilst still unpredictable, founded upon speculation that is at least backed by historic data.

With crypto, we're deep into uncharted waters. What this means is that many people either stand to gain or lose a lot of money in the next few years.

The solution? Trust no one, throw £10 into the ring and forget about it. We shouldn't be encouraging the proliferation of cryptocurrencies for projects that have no real business case for creating one.

And for all the retail investors: people are out there who want your money; whether to fund their startup, fill their bags on a project they have inside information on, or any other number of nefarious causes.

Much, much bigger forces are at play than we can really understand. Let them play while us mere mortals focus on what's important: trying to help blockchain fulfil its potential as a truly decentralised technology.

Sort:  

38.12$ has been spent to promote this content using Steemium.
Learn more here!

To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.

Congratulations @cryptowriters! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You received more than 2000 upvotes. Your next target is to reach 3000 upvotes.

You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:

The Steem community has lost an epic member! Farewell @woflhart!
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!