Hey, skripi76!

I've got a quick question about a point you made on ICOs:

"The key difference between ICO and the usual initial public offering is that companies sell not a business that has already been created, but essentially promises..."

I definitely agree with you. However, I presume that this may be a generalization. For example, I've talked to people who suggested I check out onG.social a couple of times - it turns out that their social platform has been up & running long before the ICO which is yet to come this month. That's a really valuable thing and is, in a sense, even closer to IPO, going back to your post. Does that make sense?

Thanks. : )