One of the loudest arguments against cryptocurrency adoption is probably its weakest...
There are several main arguments against cryptocurrency adoption, however, one is much more ridiculous than the others...
Which one am I talking about?
The one where you hear people saying that bitcoin and cryptocurrencies should be made illegal because they are often used to finance terrorism, drug trafficking, and other illicit activities.
You know, the one where people say bitcoin is evil because it can be used for nefarious activities.
But guess what, the US dollar funds far more of those kinds of activities than just about any other means of transcation, does that mean the dollar should be made illegal or banned as well?
By that line or thinking, yes!
To expand on that a bit, one of the main arguments as to why people have been using bitcoin to transact in nefarious activities is because of the anonymity of it all.
While that may sound true on first thought, lets think about that for a second.
When there is a transaction done on a blockchain, which is basically a public ledger, there is most certainly a trail. A digital foot print.
While it may be true that the users can use fake names and pseudonyms, the foot print remains.
To expand on that, check out a quote from regulators:
"The beauty of Bitcoin, from a detective’s point of view, is that the blockchain records all. If you catch a dealer with drugs and cash on the street, you’ve caught them committing one crime, but if you catch people using something like Silk Road, you’ve uncovered their whole criminal history. It’s like discovering their books.”
Compare that to say, something like cash.
Transactions done in dollars are not traceable. Once it moves from one party to the next there is no record of that ever happening, at least not one that lasts on a blockchain ledger forever.
That being said, it is more difficult to move large amounts of cash than it is to move large amounts of bitcoins, but that brings me to my next point.
While there may be some anonymity with a transaction of a virtual currency, it becomes much more difficult to actually turn that cryptocurrency into whatever your local fiat currency is.
This is due to all the increased verification standards that exchanges have been implementing over the last year, which only get tougher as the amount of money wanting to be moved grows larger.
It's not impossible to circumvent these standards, but it gets more difficult.
Then you factor in the tracing of IP addresses, which is not completely possible at first, however, when you start to notice patterns of transactions coming from a certain address, you can start to zero in on exactly where that bitcoin might have come from.
Take this exercept from regulators as an example:
"If the data flowing through the network were perfectly coordinated, with everyone’s computer sending and receiving data as frequently as the rest, then it might be impossible to link Bitcoin addresses with IP addresses. But there is no top-down coordination of the Bitcoin network, and its flow is far from perfect. Sometimes a computer sends out information about only one transaction, meaning that the person at that IP address was the owner of that Bitcoin address. And sometimes a surge of transactions come from a single IP address—probably when the user was upgrading his or her Bitcoin client software. Those transactions hold the key to a whole backlog of their Bitcoin addresses. Like unraveling a ball of string, once some of the addresses are isolated, others follow."
For more on that, check out this link:
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/03/why-criminals-cant-hide-behind-bitcoin
Therefore, if it's not impossible to be completely anonymous, it is much more difficult than people make it out to be.
Your response to these claims:
For these reasons, the next time you hear someone say that bitcoin and cryptocurrencies should be made illegal because they are used to finance illegal activities and are completely anonymous...
Just tell em that cash finances many more illicit activities and has been doing so for the last 200+ years.
That and using cash is actually a much better way to stay completely anonymous versus using bitcoin...
Stay informed my friends.
Sources:
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/03/why-criminals-cant-hide-behind-bitcoin
Image Sources:
http://insidebitcoins.com/news/bitcoin-is-not-anonymous-and-lacks-privacy/32945
http://www.cryptosquad.co.uk/bit-coin/how-to-demonstrate-that-bitcoin-is-not-anonymous/
Follow me: @jrcornel
Chase that jrcornel down and ask him why he is calling out the hypocrisy of the fiat folks? You could be in trouble for pointing out an obvious truth.
The anti-crypto crowd will be coming after you for highlighting this critical point.
Way to go !!! jrcornel. Keep it up
DaveB
Jrcornel bro i like your work
So creative post no doubt
I love it
Your profile picture is not uploaded. If you want to upload profile picture then see my post https://steemit.com/steemit/@tusharvasave/how-to-set-and-upload-profile-picture-and-cover-image-on-steemit
resteem this post and follow, upvote me to reach more people to this post. This post is helpful for new steemit member. Thanks.
I get frustrated explaining it to people after a while. lol some ppl just don't get it!!
Bitcoin behaves more like a "stock" than it does like a "currency" and I think that is it's biggest barrier to being accepted as a means of payment.
If I'm Amazon.com, why would I accept Bitcoin as payment when it could easily lose 20% of it's value with nothing more than Jamie Effing Dimond holding a press conference? It's way to volatile for any retail giant to have to deal with. Furthermore, why doesn't Amazon accept shares of APPL, GOOG, or MSFT as payment? When you think about it, it's really not that different.
Not FUD, just common sense questions.
@jrcornel - I agree. A currency, by itself, can not be termed good or evil. A recent example was seen in India where the government introduced a ban on higher denomination notes almost overnight and one of the stated intentions was that older high denomination notes were used by terror organizations and were being duplicated in large amounts. Lo and behold, withing 3-4 days of note ban, the new notes were discovered too in terror camps! The currency, by itself can not enable or stop anything is the morale of the story
Though a newbie in crypto, I am a Steem loyalist now and even have a 147 year plan to earn 1 Million SBD as I have mentioned in my recent post. LOL
Thanks for this thought provoking article. Upvoted full.
Regards,
@vm2904
I wish you luck over the next 147 years. :)
Thanks. Lol - Per my post, I have already made my 1 million SBD and invented the time machine to travel back to this moment so that I can enjoy the company of great thinkers on Steemit. :)
@jrcornell - very true of course but you're preaching to the choir here. Unfortunately those who need to understand this will never see it or not see it until it's too late.
The actual biggest hurdle to it's adoption at this point is lack of usability. The regulators requiring KYC and AML plug the dam of equity leak from a very corrupt banking system. It will slow this down, perhaps just long enough for bitcoin or some other altcoins to scale enough to take over. It's a matter of time.
This has always been used by authorities as a 'danger' of bitcoin etc. As you clearly articulate, a concept should not be banned simply because it has the capacity to be used for bad. It is the bad action that is illegal and not the ability to conduct it. If everything that 'could' be used for illegal activities was banned, very few legal activities would take place as they would not be possible! They need a better argument than that.
Nice article. Thanks
Your profile picture is not uploaded. If you want to upload profile picture then see my post https://steemit.com/steemit/@tusharvasave/how-to-set-and-upload-profile-picture-and-cover-image-on-steemit
resteem this post and follow, upvote me to reach more people to this post. This post is helpful for new steemit member. Thanks.
If people don't want to learn or beeing a part of the changing world, new things (everything after their puberty) will be rejected.
Intangible goods are scary for them, because they can't touch these goods. E.g. in Germany old people often only use cash because these plastic cards are 'some new bullshit' they can't or don't want to understand.
Kryptos are the newest 'financial innovation' and more currently living people are to old (= to scary) to understand.
Learn every day, be a part of the changing world! :)
Your profile picture is not uploaded. If you want to upload profile picture then see my post https://steemit.com/steemit/@tusharvasave/how-to-set-and-upload-profile-picture-and-cover-image-on-steemit
resteem this post and follow, upvote me to reach more people to this post. This post is helpful for new steemit member. Thanks.
People don't support what they don't understand and they relate with stupid reasons like that, in my opinion this is good because the grow will be steady and people will slowly realize the potential of blockchain technology.
Thanks for sharing