Yes I think so, it will be great to see a different variation. I agree as well that from a user perspective, the interface is a huge hurdle, as it currently is becoming hard work to find the relevant stuff to you. The growth in users and diversity of topics is great but needs to be tamed into something manageable for users. I actually was wondering about the filterbubble problem. Facebook shows you stuff that they think you should see, which has its issues. I would love a handy way to define my own filterbubble: a few levers that allow sophisticated filters on topics, keywords, authors, communities.
It would be great if the platform could have a standard filter built in that allows me to see when several of people I follow voted for the same post for instance. That might be an interesting trigger to serve that post for my viewing, it would be a variation on curation, allowing you to build your feed based on not all the upvotes of everyone which is what the current trending and hot pages are and which are pretty useless. I would like a feed of top posts voted by people I follow, whose taste I trust (maybe that needs to be a sub list).
Basically it's a sophisticated filter but I don't know how difficult that would be to make or how heavy it would be if it would need to constantly query the blockchain .