You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Manual Curation vs Automatic Curation
STEEMIT SHOULD exclude automated curation. This thing easy to abuse for those who get apropriate level of trust. Because of those automated curation you sometimes exclaimed "Why this garbage gets so high payouts?".
Read, and only then upvote.
Steemit SHOULD but it CANNOT because of its core nature. How can software in a node verify a human when it doesn't already have the answer? If it does have an answer, a rogue node can say some user has passed the humanity test for voting but also lie about it.
Could it only allow a vote if you actually view the post? Or can a bot open a post as well?
Could it only allow a vote if you actually view the post? Or can a bot open a post as well?