You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Suggestions To Make Curation More Rewarding - Part 3 - Revive & Remonetize Old Posts (Under Specific Conditions)
Love the thoughts and your list of ways to pull it off.
As the new people join they have missed the value of past posts. We could argue that there is always more new material being created, so past posts being revived is not necessary, but...When a past post didn't get much traction because someone is new, has low power and/or low number of followers, why should quality posts not get a second chance? I love the idea of making the promoted task actually useful.
voted and resteemed. Let's get this conversation going!
Thank you!
To be fair, I am envisioning this in a way that few posts would make the cut. I would say most of my posts would not justify being revived later, and I consider the bar of quality I keep for posting to me far higher than the average.
However, I do have a few posts that continues to get views and replies months later. One of them I've seen being passed around as a link on Reddit. These are the types of posts - the ones that are still useful - that might warrant use of this "reviving" function.