You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Leading By Example: A New Approach To Curation Guilds

in #curation8 years ago (edited)

you realize that this will be very difficult to do right?
My thought was that this guild fills in the gaps of the other guilds. The other guilds so far are not supporting controversial, humor, high engagement, people with high rep, etc......part of me thinks that if we focus our attention on certain areas we will have more success in filling in the gaps. What you're describing, with each person focused on different subject areas is starting to sound exactly like what SG does. I don't think recreating the entire wheel will be a good idea. It all depends on how much people really get on board. Do you understand my concerns?
Curie supports new authors. I think we should let Curie do that, and focus more specifically on things that neither Guild will even touch.
But with that, no post is "off limits" unless it's illegal...

Sort:  

the reason to re-invent the wheel (so to speak) is that the wheel currently charges the reward pool thousands of dollars a week to turn.

Oh. Lol. After all we discussed I could not have been clear enough about my idea. I don't want to fill the gaps. I want to improve on the current system that is damaging the site, and eventually negate the need for them to exist- or at the very least get them to follow a better model, or join us if their intentions are really to make steemit better and to reward the best content.

If we have something that works better and doesn't afflict the platform with any negative side-effects, then if those in guilds that are damaging the platform do not get on board, their true colours and their true motivations will be exposed.

I am optimistic enough to hope that they will be excited to see something better out there, and will try to help.