You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The HumanBot Curator Incubator & Link Drop v2.0.1
Nice Information and Original Content
https://steemit.com/health/@mustayani/the-greatest-benefit-of-honey
Wannabe @curie curator : )
Nice Information and Original Content
https://steemit.com/health/@mustayani/the-greatest-benefit-of-honey
Wannabe @curie curator : )
This is a nice post if it is the work of the post author - I haven't done the deep dive into previous postings, done any Google searching yet or any other measures to detect plagiarism. But even before I do that, I want to note that in the case of a factual article like this, there has to be sources cited. Where did the author get all this info about honey? Read it in a book? An article? Found it on a website? Learned it in college? When it comes to submitting a post to Curie, if it is a factual article there needs to be sources listed or it will never be approved.
As I suspected this is plagiarized. Again you don't seem to have that 6th sense that should be telling you something isn't right about these pieces. I have told you this before, but you really need to start looking at the blog of an author and taking into account their whole output when you are trying to decide if an article is the work of the author. Of the last 3 articles this author has written , including this one, one was flagged down below $0 payout, and another was noted to be plagiarism by a reader in the comments who left a link to the article that mustayani had "rewritten" (read, changed a few words around to make it less likely the plagiarism would be detected). But even without looking at the past history I was pretty sure this was plagiarized - you just don't see an article with this many facts and this well written that doesn't cite ANY sources... unless it is plagiarized.