You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: I could be in jail in 60 minutes. I've been using myself as "stingbait" for 8 years, gathering evidence of corruption at Court. On Friday, I got what I needed, but at the cost of exposing myself to being jailed on contempt.
Yep, tolerating rule by force will be our downfall.
My contrary opinion is that the path to empowerment is not to eliminate force, which is impossible, but instead to distribute it widely by destroying all concentrations of power, thus empowering individuals generally.
IOW, anarchy is not a stable equilibrium. True "government by the people" should be our goal, our vision. There are two kinds of power, the power to control your own life, and the power to control the lives of others. Conversations about anarchy are basically masturbation. Time so spent is wasted. In California, people are, on paper, totally empowered; the Constitution of the State of California is a stunningly beautiful expression of individual sovereignty and autonomy, not at the level that an anarchist hopes for, but at a level that is realistically achievable with a dense, diverse, and numerous urban population such as we have here. The disempowerment in California is not the fault of oppressive law. It is the fault of renegade officials who disobey the law, and of a clueless, ignorant, selfish electorate who votes these assholes into office and not only tolerates their unlawfulness but demands it of them.
That's is the real world battlefield for individual empowerment and sovereignty. I stand on that battlefield alone. An army approaches, but I have single handedly managed to keep them at bay.
I am your opportunity to show that you are not just beautiful talk. (Not you personally; I am using you to express my challenge generally.)