You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Update Gentherapie: Geschichte und Ausblick

in #deutsch • 5 years ago

Thanks for removing the flag. Be ensured that I will not use the stem, steem-stem, de-stem and science tags anymore and that I won´t curate scientific content anymore.
But be also ensured, that if I decide to stay (I have to sleep over it) I will check such content, and if I find a verbiage that is not referenced and highlighted "exactly specifying each part of the text", then I will flag and give you a mention in a comment.
A recent example. This article on steemstem.io did quote a source without referencing it. Is this OK for you?
image.png

It is sad, as I wrote many scientific articles in the past and never had any problems. My approach is a more journalistic one, to try to bring science content to non-scientists, but if this is not appreciated then so be it.

5 years ago in #deutsch by
$0.00
    3 votes
    Reply 2
    Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     5 years ago 

    Hi, thanks a lot for you reply.

    I will check that article up now. Thanks for reporting.

    Feel free to report abuse on our website (providing sources). Better not to just tag us as we are likely not to notice mention under the post.

    It's the best to report it here.
    http://steemcleaners.com/reports/new

    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       5 years ago 

      I cannot find any source of plagiarism. Would you please give me source from which it is plagiarised.

      Steemit article appear to original and belonging to the person owning the blog wissensagentur.net.

      Everything quoted seems to be properly put in quote markdown and sourced right next to marked text.

      The personal thought parts does not seem to be found anywhere else. It may be plagiarism but I cannot find it yet. Your source would help

      $0.00
        Reply