digibyte > litecoin why not?!
i have not been in the cryptospace for long but when i compare digibyte to litecoin i don't see why digibyte's not in litecoins place.
reasons:
- digibytes faster then litecoin
- they can both have atomic swaps
when ever people talk about digibyte its either scam coin or shitcoin with no evidence or proof, then on the other hand its gonna moon. i honestly thing digibyte could replace litecoin just on its speed. why has this not happened please comment.
I think the main reason why Digibyte is not in the top 20 or even the top 10 is its nonexistent marketing team. Digibyte is cheap, very fast and transaction fees are very low. It could easily take the place that bitcoin is ignoring in the microtransactions market.