Physicist Shares Data Deemed ‘Too Controversial’ By TED – Collective Evolution

• The Details:

  John Ioannidis, an epidemiologist on the Stanford College Faculty of Medication, printed an article titled "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False," which subsequently grew to become essentially the most extensively accessed article within the historical past.

• Replicate On:

  The company affect that has now taken over science. How a lot of our science is actually legit? How a lot of it's false? How a lot of it's dogma?

each day. Should you’re one who generally factors to the “peer-reviewed” label, then you need to know that there are a lot of researchers and insiders who've been creating consciousness about the issue with this label for years.

Who Says So? And From What Fields?

Many individuals have spoken up in opposition to the corporatization and politicization of science. For instance, Professor Lennart Bengtsson, a Swedish climatologist and former director of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg, has voiced his concern that some scientists are, based on an interview given to the Each day Mail, “mixing up their scientific role with that of climate activist.” He claims that there are a number of indicators for the way “science is gradually being influenced by political views.” (source) Professor Joanna D. Haigh, a British physicist, professor of atmospheric physics at Imperial Faculty London, co-director of the Grantham Institute for Local weather Change, and former president of the Royal Meteorological Society, has additionally spoken up in regards to the politicization of local weather science. (source)

The Australian prime minister’s chief enterprise advisor has completed the identical, and so produce other politicians, like Senator James Inhofe, chairman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Atmosphere and Public Works. You may learn extra about that story here.
Sadly, the mainstream vilifies such individuals, and to nice impact.
Under is an wonderful snippet of a lecture given by Richard Lindzen, one of many world’s prime specialists within the area and lead creator of “Physical Climate Processes and Feedbacks,” Chapter 7 of the Intergovernmental Panel on Local weather Change’s Third Evaluation Report on local weather change. He is aware of that each one local weather science we obtain is IPCC United Nations science. One of many scientists talked about on the senator’s record, on this video, he talks in regards to the politics of local weather science and the manipulation of knowledge — one thing that plagues all fields of science immediately.

• Medical Science/Well being Science/Meals

Within the case of drugs, quite a lot of info has emerged exhibiting simply how a lot corruption actually goes on. The Editors-in-Chiefs of a number of main medical journals have been fairly blunt, with maybe top-of-the-line examples coming from Dr. Richard Horton, the present Editor-in-Chief of The Lancet, who says, “The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue.” (source)

Dr. Marcia Angell, a doctor and longtime Editor-in-Chief of the New England Medical Journal (NEMJ), additionally thought of some of the prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals on this planet, alongside The Lancet, has mentioned that “it's merely now not doable to consider a lot of the scientific analysis that's printed, or to depend on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical tips. I take no pleasure on this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my 20 years as an editor of The New England Journal of Medication.” (source)

John Ioannidis, an epidemiologist on the Stanford College Faculty of Medication, printed an article titled “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False,” which subsequently grew to become essentially the most extensively accessed article within the historical past of the Public Library of Science (PLoS). (source)

Right here is one other nice quote:

“The medical career is being purchased by the pharmaceutical trade, not solely by way of the observe of drugs, but in addition by way of educating and analysis. The educational establishments of this nation are permitting themselves to be the paid brokers of the pharmaceutical trade. I believe it’s disgraceful.”

As you'll be able to see, this has been an issue for fairly a while.

A Couple of Examples:

Top-of-the-line examples of political affect over scientific publication comes from an episode involving Genetically Modified Maize. Monsanto printed a examine a couple of years in the past which presupposed to display the results of GMO maize on rats over a 90 day interval. They reported no sick results on the rodents from this food regimen. Given the truth that there are not any long run research inspecting the well being dangers related to GMOs, impartial researchers then determined to conduct the identical examine, with one distinction: Their examine lasted over a 12 months fairly than a mere three months. Researchers discovered cases of severe liver and kidney damage, as well as hormonal disturbances, alongside the development of large tumours and mortality among the treatment groups. The examine was printed in November of 2012, within the Journal of Meals and Chemical Toxicology, after which immediately retracted. After a whole bunch of scientists condemned the retraction, the U.S. didn't publish it. The examine was then re-published in a number of peer-reviewed scientific journals (in Europe final 12 months [2014]), like Environmental Sciences Europe. For this reason it shouldn’t be a shock that so many international locations in Europe have banned the growing of genetically modified crops. Many even have bans and/or extreme restrictions on importing GM merchandise, citing well being and environmental issues.

This reality was additionally made clear by WikiLeaks paperwork:

Resistance to the arrival of genetically modified meals has been pronounced throughout Europe. The continent options a number of the strictest laws governing the use and cultivation of GMO merchandise, and public skepticism about biotech items is sort of excessive – a reality not misplaced on American diplomats. In a prolonged report courting from late 2007 , a cable issued by the State Division outlined its “Biotechnology Outreach Technique, ‘which, among other things, recognized the European Union’s ‘negative views on biology’ and dedicated as a nationwide precedence to limiting them (O7STATE160639).

Preliminary consideration paid to the State Division’s half in pushing industrial manufactures on its allies obscured the even greater position it performed in assuring a spot for genetically modified agricultural merchandise (GMOs) in a area that largely needed nothing to do with them. The American marketing campaign selling biotech merchandise was a worldwide effort. In all, some 1,00Zero paperwork from the Cablegate cache handle this effort, a big variety of which originate in Europe. U.S. diplomats on the continent gave appreciable consideration to insuring the pursuits of American biotech corporations in Europe – Whether or not by means of “education” applications, authorities lobbying, or outright coercion – in addition to stripping down European Union laws designed to behave as a bugger in opposition to them. Out there cables printed by WikiLeaks counsel that america invests appreciable time, effort, and expense in its operations on behalf of the American biotech corporations.

Learn extra about it from The WikiLeaks Files: The World According To U.S. Empire.

In 1996, Steven M. Druker, being a public curiosity lawyer and the Govt Director of the Alliance For Bio-Integrity, initiated a lawsuit in 1998 that pressured the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) to disclose its recordsdata on genetically engineered meals. He’s just lately published a book on the lawsuit that supplies particulars of his expertise. He has additionally launched the documents on his website, exhibiting the numerous hazards of genetically engineering meals and the issues within the FDA’s coverage. It’s referred to as Altered Genes, Twisted Truth: How the Venture to Genetically Engineer Our Food Has Subverted Science, Corrupted Government, and Systematically Deceived the Public. There are a variety of examples to select from right here, however antidepressants make the highest of the record. Irving Kirsch, a lecturer in drugs at Harvard Medical Faculty, printed a examine stating how “analyses of the published data and the unpublished data that were hidden by drug companies reveals that most (if not all) of the benefits are due to the placebo effect.” (source) One other examine printed within the British Medical Journal by researchers on the Nordic Cochrane Heart in Copenhagen confirmed that pharmaceutical firms weren't disclosing all info concerning the outcomes of their drug trials. Researchers checked out paperwork from 70 completely different double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI) and located that the total extent of great hurt in scientific examine reviews went unreported.

Tamang Sharma, a PhD scholar at Cochrane and lead creator of the examine, mentioned: “We found that a lot of the appendices were often only available upon request to the authorities, and the authorities had never requested them. I’m actually kind of scared about how bad the actual situation would be if we had the complete data.” (source)

One other co-author of the examine, Dr. Peter Gotzsche, who co-founded the Cochrane Collaboration (the world’s foremost physique in assessing medical proof), present in a separate evaluation that 100,00Zero individuals in america die every year from the unwanted effects of accurately used prescribed drugs, noting that “it’s remarkable that nobody raises an eyebrow when we kill so many of our own citizens with drugs.” He has printed many papers arguing that our use of antidepressants is inflicting extra hurt than good, and making an allowance for the latest leaks concerning these medicine, it appears he's right.

Under is a short video of him elaborating on this downside:

Vaccines are getting extra consideration now than ever earlier than. In actual fact, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Chairman of the World Mercury Project (WMP), just lately introduced a $100,000 problem aimed toward placing an finish to the inclusion of mercury, a neurotoxin that's 100 instances extra toxic than lead, in vaccines administered in the united statesand globally. It’s provided to anyone, together with journalists and scientists, who can present a examine exhibiting that it's protected to inject mercury into infants. This might be tough, as a whole bunch of research (that have been additionally current on the press convention in print type) present it's completely unsafe, and might considerably improve the danger of creating neurodegenerative issues. You may learn extra about this here. A number of instances of vaccine fraud have been uncovered, however that is one thing you won't know given the truth that the mainstream media utterly ignores these information, and vaccines are closely marketed. For instance, Lucija Tomljenovic, who has a PhD in biochemistry and is a senior postdoctoral fellow in UBC’s School of Medication, in addition to a medical investigator, uncovered paperwork that reveal vaccine producers, pharmaceutical firms, and well being authorities have identified about a number of risks related to vaccines however selected to withhold them from the general public. (source) However maybe one of many largest revelations in medical historical past, additionally sadly ignored by mainstream media, got here solely a few years in the past and continues to be making noise, because it ought to. Dr. William Thompson, a longtime senior CDC scientist, printed a number of the mostly cited pro-vaccine research, which confirmed that there was completely no hyperlink between the MMR vaccine and autism (Thompson, et al. 2007, Price, et al. 2010, Destefano, et al. 2004). Nonetheless, Dr. Thompson just lately admitted that it was “the bottom level” in his profession when he “went along with that paper.” He went on to say that he and the opposite authors “didn’t report significant findings” and that he's “utterly ashamed” of what he did. He was “complicit and went together with this,” and regrets that he has “been part of the issue.” (source)(source)(source) A examine with revised info and no knowledge omitted was printed by Dr. Brian Hooker (a contact of Dr. Thompson) within the peer reviewed journal Translational Neurodegeneration, and it discovered a 340% elevated threat of autism in African American boys receiving the Measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine. The examine has since been retracted, across the identical time this controversy arose. You may learn the total examine here, though, unsurprisingly, it has since been retracted. Thompson’s attorneys, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Bryan Smith of Morgan & Morgan, additionally launched an announcement from Dr. Thompson, which talked about Hooker: “I've had many discussions with Dr. Brian Hooker over the past 10 months concerning research the CDC has carried out concerning vaccines and neurodevelopmental outcomes together with autism spectrum issues. I share his perception that CDC decision-making and analyses needs to be clear.” (source) he needed to invoke whistleblower safety and turned intensive company recordsdata over to Congress. He mentioned that, for the previous decade, his superiors have pressured him and his fellow scientists to lie and manipulate knowledge to hide a causal hyperlink between vaccines and mind accidents, together with autism.

Ultimate Ideas

As you'll be able to see, scientific fraud is a giant downside throughout the board, and this text has solely offered a couple of examples. The issue isn't just with GMOs and vaccines — it impacts cosmetics, meals, cleansing provides, and a lot extra. How have so many merchandise, which trigger so a lot hurt, been authorized by the businesses which can be tasked to guard us? There are such a lot of books on this subject, however they don’t get the eye they deserve, for the reason that main mainstream media shareholders are equivalent to these of the whole well being trade. Why would they bash their very own merchandise on their very own nationwide tv networks? The facility of company America has taken over virtually each facet of our lives. Should you’re questioning what we will do about it, effectively, I consider step one is consciousness. There may be nonetheless a plethora of knowledge that most of the people is totally unaware of, but when we backtrack to a decade in the past, info that was thought of a conspiracy is now merely reality. An incredible instance is the company takeover of science, as mentioned on this article, however one other one may very well be the Snowden Leaks on mass surveillance, or 9/11. Research at the moment are being printed by physicists and engineers concerning that occasion. Consciousness makes it tougher for the elite to control us. As soon as we turn out to be conscious of one thing, we will cease it. For instance, take a look at Genetically Modified Meals and the pesticides that go along with them. As quickly because the plenty grew to become conscious of their risks, they started to alter their purchasing habits. Now, most international locations around the globe have utterly banned these meals. It’s tough to just accept that there are unseen powers, motivated by their very own greed and lust for energy, which can be doing us hurt disguised nearly as good. It's only when we turn out to be conscious of how we're being harmed and alter our purchasing habits — hurting their backside line — that they modify their techniques. Alternatively, it’s encouraging to know that after we do come collectively for a typical purpose, something will be completed, and we really do have the potential and energy to alter our world.