Should each STEEM hard-fork reset witness votes?
Should each STEEM hard-fork reset witness votes?
The STEEM blockchain is ruled by Steemit Inc and top witnesses. Witnesses are voted for by stake holders based on SP, but voting really is fire and forget. Currently a witness vote, once cast remains valid until explicitly removed.
In a normal democracy, we need to vote periodically. If you don't vote your vote won't get counted, no matter what you voted for the last time around. If you die, no more voting for you.
On the STEEM blockchain though, if you die, or less dramatic, stop caring about the platform or the votes you may have cast in the past, your old vote will remain valid indefinetely no matter what.
In society, our leaders are chosen, they get a set amount of time to change things. Then a new election happens where society judges the leaders on what they achieved or failed to achieve the previous period.
At each hard fork major changes happen to the block chain for those still involved in the platform. You could say the results of a HF are the subject on what our leadership, the top witnesses, should be judged.
As such it can be argued that a hard fork should reset all witness votes, or possibly, initiate a timer for resetting all witness votes.
So the question: Do you think a HF should result in witness votes being reset?
- Yes, immediately after the HF takes effect.
- Yes, N days after the HF takes effect all pre-HF witness votes should expire
- No, but witness votes should expire after a given time.
- No, witness voting is perfect as it is.
- Other (comment)
Answer the question at dpoll.xyz.
Voted for
Interesting suggestion that I think would lead to much better outcomes. Especially with votes expiring shortly after the HF, people will have in mind how each witness handled testing, approval, and communication around the HF; making the votes much more sensitive to how the witnesses handled... only their most important job.
Voted for
Voted for
Voting is perfect the way it is. We have the power to add or remove at any time.
I have a few witnesses that I have followed and want to continue to support until they screw up, or I find that others are doing a better job. Why does this need to change?
We can vote to add or remove after a hardfork, before a hardfork, or any time we like without having to do busy work of constantly renewing our already determined choices.
Thanks for contributing to the dPoll content.
You have been upvoted from our community curation account (@dpoll.curation) in courtesy of This Guy... @bluerobo.
Come, join our community at dPoll discord server.
If you want to support dPoll curation, you can also delegate some steem power. Quick steem connect links to delegate:
50SP | 100SP | 250SP | 500SP
Voted for
Voted for
Voted for
Voted for
Voted for
I think this is a great idea. Since 90%+ of steemers are dead, each time we change the game, the votes should need to be redone.
Voted for
A vote decay would be nice.