You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Being Mean to Statists
So according to you, if someone was all the way and openly a Nazi, it would be divisive, and would constitute violence, to say that that's bad? Um, no. 100% dead wrong. Advocating statism is advocating ACTUAL violence. Someone saying something you don't like isn't violence. Yes, there very much IS an "in group" and an "out group" when it comes to whether people condone the violent subjugation of mankind. ALL statists do, and ALL statists should be condemned--whether gently or bluntly--for doing so. (Once again, you seem to just fish for things to argue about under my posts, even if they make little or no sense.)
''So according to you, if someone was all the way and openly a Nazi, it would be divisive, and would constitute violence, to say that that's bad? ''
Disagreeing with things people do and say is essential. Its what I am doing here with you right now! and you with me. But saying something is 'bad' just seems to be ignorant and childish to me. It looks to me like employing the Statist strategy of creating in groups and out groups. Tapping into peoples hate.
The way I see it, the vast majority of us have been indoctrinated into seeing the 'State' as valid and necessary. Many many people see the State as their protector and are not even consciously aware that they see it that way.
And just because you do not understand something just yet, does not even imply that it does not make sense. It just means that we have not found common ground yet. The enemy is only exists in your head.
No, condemning evil is not "tapping into hate." Duh.
that may be true, but it is not what I said is it?
I am sure i would have said something like, creating in groups and out groups or vilifying individuals is tapping into peoples hate. It not so helpful if our aim is to create anything like a democratic world.
And i dont understand, why if you teach others how to connect in a different way, why you choose not to employ those strategies on your own channel.