I think it's important you are clear on your position, and even though we don't agree on conclusions, some of your points are fair.

My biggest contention is on the airdrop part of the "unfairness", since it seems to me that although is not a rule, per say, all of us who are into crypto understand (or attempt to understand) voluntarism.

Which is to say, I don't have to do a thing for anyone. I may want to, or not, but I'm not forced by a centralized governance to do so.

With that in mind any fork that STEEM ever gets, if indeed it gets another one (it might). Does not have to airdrop tokens to anyone by default.

We could talk about the negative effects of not doing so, which of course is very valid, and there are plenty to talk about, but the obligation part is where I take issue.

I, like you, considered the freezing of Justin's tokens to be a mistake. Not because I trust Justin, I don't, and not even a little bit at this point. But more so because it was the first act of aggression so to speak. Things escalated, catalyzed by this first action, and I won't say I didn't see it coming.

All that being said. Justin showed no hesitation whatsoever to override core ideologies of cryptocurrencies, and thus I (only speak for myself) prefer to remove myself from the equation.

I do wish you well, and I mean this sincerely. I hope that your efforts get recognized and that dtube takes off. It sure has been quite a journey.